[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #265: Guidance on the request URI structure needed? (openid/fapi)

[tlodderstedt]

New issue 265: Guidance on the request URI structure needed?
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/265/guidance-on-the-request-uri-structure

Torsten Lodderstedt:

BC QUESTION: should there some more guidance provided on or requirements around the structure of the URI value? For example it could use the RFC6755 subnamespace and registry and be of the form `urn:ietf:params:oauth:request_uri:<<random-part>>`, which gives a clear indication of what it is and would keep people from inventing their own URIs.