[Openid-specs-fapi] Renaming FAPI

Tom Jones thomasclinganjones at gmail.com
Tue Apr 10 20:02:03 UTC 2018


its is a profile for an open id spec - why repeat openid over and over and
over again this dance is going to be a drag.

openID protection provided for openID connect on top of openID OAuth?

Peace ..tom

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 12:33 PM, Mike Schwartz via Openid-specs-fapi <
openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> FAPI WG,
>
> Putting "user" in the name might cause confusion with "User Managed
> Access" (UMA).
>
> Why wouldn't you want to leverage the existing "OpenID" Branding?
>
> If not "OpenID Plus" then "OpenID ____"?
>
> What strikes me about FAPI is that it's the most secure profile of OpenID
> Connect, and can be used by the OP to increase assurance, and the RP to
> increase protection. So "OpenID Plus" says it's basically OpenID... with
> some extra stuff to make it extra secure.
>
> - Mike
>
>
>
>
> On 2018-04-10 14:16, Brian Campbell via Openid-specs-fapi wrote:
>
>> I also think a more broadly applicable term like "user" is preferable
>> to "consumer".
>>
>> Spitballing a few:
>>
>> User Resource Protection
>> User Resource Protection Profiles
>> Enhanced User Resource Protection Profiles
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Tom Jones via Openid-specs-fapi
>> <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>
>> i prefer the term "user" as it is broader.
>>>
>>> How about
>>> User Protection Profiles
>>>
>>> Peace ..tom
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Sarah Squire via Openid-specs-fapi
>>> <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey Folks,
>>>>
>>>> At the last OpenID Foundation Board meeting, the board agreed that
>>>> since FAPI is not limited to the financial sector and does not
>>>> proscribe API designs, it should be renamed.
>>>>
>>>> The fundamental thing that differentiates the OpenID Foundation's
>>>> OpenAPI working groups is that they focus on consumer-facing
>>>> ecosystems as opposed to enterprise, so we could focus it in that
>>>> direction.
>>>>
>>>> Instead of saying API, we could say something like resource or
>>>> protected resource.
>>>>
>>>> How about
>>>>
>>>> Consumer Resource Protection (CRP)
>>>>
>>>> Delegated Resource Access for Consumer-facing Operators (DRACO)
>>>>
>>>> Delegated Protection of Consumer Resources (DPCR)
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Sarah
>>>>
>>>> PS I work for Ping Identity. Sending this from an old email
>>>> address because of IPR/mailing list issues.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
>>>> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
>>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi [1]
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
>>> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
>>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi [1]
>>>
>>
>> _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and
>> privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any
>> review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly
>> prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please
>> notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any
>> file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
>>
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
>> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fapi/attachments/20180410/5da07b6f/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-fapi mailing list