[Openid-specs-fapi] [Bitbucket] Issue #123: Is it okay for request object URNs to be predictable? (openid/fapi)

[Joseph Heenan]

[josephheenan]
Joseph Heenan commented on issue #123:
Is it okay for request object URNs to be predictable?<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/123/is-it-okay-for-request-object-urns-to-be>

Thanks Dave. That makes sense to me; I've opened a pull request:

https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/pull-requests/35/part-2-tidy-up-wording-around-request/diff





View this issue<https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/123/is-it-okay-for-request-object-urns-to-be> or add a comment by replying to this email.

Unsubscribe from issue emails<https://bitbucket.org/api/1.0/repositories/openid/fapi/issue/123/unsubscribe/openid/df2bfe7836723d6e685249a416e7c899130d4b87/> for this repository.               [Bitbucket]  <https://bitbucket.org>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-fapi/attachments/20170914/f2fc7734/attachment-0001.html>