[Openid-specs-fapi] Ticket #60 (was Re: Starting the WGLC for FAPI Part 2)

[Nat Sakimura]

Hi Tom,

I have just replied to the ticket.

In essence, TB is for the future. Google etc. are betting on it so I 
expect wider support in a few years time that would make the life of 
developers easier. For now, we should use MTLS. (I have proposed another 
method in IETF, which is truly end-to-end, and Tony supported it in the 
last meeting but I need more support. Of course - that one is not 
channel-bound and thus it has its own downside. )

Maybe John B. can chime in here as the chair of TB WG while he is in 
transit to Munich.

---
Nat Sakimura
Research Fellow, Nomura Research Institute
Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation

On 2017-05-07 01:06, Tom Jones wrote:
> i believe issue #60 needs to be addressed first.   ..tomj
> 
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 10:50 PM, Nat Sakimura via Openid-specs-fapi
> <openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> 
>> FAPIers:
>> 
>> I am happy to inform you that we are starting the one-week WG last
>> call for FAPI Part 2.
>> The URL is
>> 
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/src/master/Financial_API_WD_002.md?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
>> [1]
>> 
>> The normative content has been stable for more than a month except
>> the introduction of new clause 7, Request object registration
>> endpoint. Please review at your earliest convenience and file issues
>> if there are.
>> 
>> If there is no sustainable objection, I will take it as a consensus
>> and submit it to the OIDF secretary to start the all member ballot.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> --
>> Nat Sakimura
>> Research Fellow, Nomura Research Institute
>> Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
>> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi [2]
> 
> --
> 
> ..tom
> 
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/src/master/Financial_API_WD_002.md?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
> [2] http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi