[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #82: Strict Access Control to logs (openid/fapi)

[Nat Sakimura]

Hi

We are using languages defined in ISO Directive Part 2 as we are 
thinking of submitting it to ISO/TC68.
So, all "should" == "SHOULD", "shall" == "MUST". There is no "should" as 
a dictionary term.

---
Nat Sakimura
Chairman, OpenID Foundation

On 2017-03-23 20:56, Pamela Dingle via Openid-specs-fapi wrote:
> New issue 82: Strict Access Control to logs
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/82/strict-access-control-to-logs
> 
> Pamela Dingle:
> 
> In section 7.4.1 of the read-only spec, there is a sentence that says
> "Strict access control to the logs in such cases should be enforced."
> -- is this a should as in a normative MUST, or did the spec the word
> should in a regular conversational way?  It is unclear whether this
> spec is a recommendation or a command.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi