[Openid-specs-fapi] Issue #64: "non monotonically increasing" does not cover all cases (openid/fapi)

[Nat Sakimura]

New issue 64: "non monotonically increasing" does not cover all cases
https://bitbucket.org/openid/fapi/issues/64/non-monotonically-increasing-does-not

Nat Sakimura:

Currently, it states: 

    shall provide opaque, non-monotonically increasing 
    or non-guessable access tokens with a minimum of 128 bits 
    as defined in section 5.1.4.2.2 of [RFC6819]

Since non-monotonically decreasing is equally bad, this statement is inaccurate. 
It should just say: 

    shall provide opaque and non-guessable access tokens 
    with a minimum of 128 bits 
    as defined in section 5.1.4.2.2 of [RFC6819]

Responsible: Nat