[Openid-specs-fapi] Re figo API (was Re: AW: (Correction) Friendly reminder and agenda for Sept. 14 Call)

[Nat Sakimura]

Hi Anton,

Yes, with my cursory look, it is pretty close in some sense -- though 
they need to lock down the OAuth security more, besides they are mixing 
up OAuth 2 Authorization with Authentication to start with. What I have 
written in the WD1 clause 5 and 6 is pretty much the minimum requirement 
when the client wants to support multiple authorization servers. I 
cannot see them in the figo documentation. Assumption might be that they 
are the aggregator and the clients only talks to them. Even then, 
depending on the environment that the client is in, using RFC7636 etc. 
would be advisable.

Also, DDA apparently is much richer and complete in the supported 
products sense.
With figo API, I am not sure how to support futures, options, etc.
Also, I cannot readily see how to express tax efficient investment plans
but it may be hiding behind.

Another shortcoming that I see in figo is that they do not seem to have 
Open Data for Banks, e.g., ATM location, products information, etc. We 
need them as per required by the UK Open Banking Standard.

But then, I have just looked at if for couple of minutes. I need more 
time to study them.

Thanks for the info. Would you like to add this to today's agenda?

Best,

Nat

On 2016-09-14 19:41, Anton.Taborszky at telekom.de wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Last week, I came across the following website: http://figo.io (only
> german). However, the api documentation is in english:
> http://docs.figo.io/
> Isn't that mainly the goal of the FAPI working group?
> 
> Talk to you shortly
> Anton
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Openid-specs-fapi
> [mailto:openid-specs-fapi-bounces at lists.openid.net] Im Auftrag von Nat
> Sakimura via Openid-specs-fapi
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. September 2016 11:59
> An: Openid-specs Fapi
> Betreff: [Openid-specs-fapi] (Correction) Friendly reminder and agenda
> for Sept. 14 Call
> 
> Previously, I sent out the notice with wrong date.
> The time that I have sent was already past the time so I suppose it
> was obvious, but I would like to apologize for the confusion.
> 
> The calendar is showing the correct date anyways.
> Please always refer to the group calendar at 
> http://openid.net/wg/fapi/.
> This is the master information.
> 
> --------------
> 
> Dear FAPI Members:
> 
> Here is a friendly reminder and the agenda for the Sept. 14 Call.
> 
> Looking forward to talk with you.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Nat Sakimura
> 
> ============================================
> FAPI WG Meeting Notes (2016-09-14)
> ============================================
> Date & Time: 2016-09-14 14:00 UTC
>        (07:00 PDT, 15:00 UK, 16:00 Denmark, 23:00 JST)
> Location: GoToMeeting https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/321819862
> 
> Agenda
> ========
> 1.   Roll Call
> 2.   Adoption of the Agenda
> 3.   External Org Relationships
> 3.1.   UK Implementation Entity (Dave)
> 3.2.   Federal Reserve of Minnesota (John)
> 3.3.   ECB Consultation (Dave)
> 3.4.   X9 (Paul?)
> 4.   Branch issue/26 Error messages (Sascha)
> 5.   Working Draft 01
> 5.1.   Review Results (John, Brian)
> 6.   Issues
> 6.1.   #7 Open Data (Dave)
> 6.2.   #16 Client Authentication -- Do we need TLS mutual
> authentication? (Nat)
> 6.3.   #28 International names for retirement savings account names
> (Dave/Nat)
> 7.   Events
> 7.1.   Pre-IIW (John)
> 7.2.   Pre-IETF (Nat)
> 8.   AOB
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-fapi mailing list
> Openid-specs-fapi at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-fapi