[OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Proposed eKYC and IDA WG Agenda for 06-09-2023

[Mark Haine]

Hi All,

The zoom for the Working Group call today:  https://zoom.us/j/91073811618?pwd=YXBkcTBkakpkeVVsc1JuRlJzUVZrZz09

Agenda

Brief review of external Orgs & Events
Any to share?

Main Agenda Items
The move to final for OpenID Connect for Identity Assurance


Identity Assurance



              PR #167 fixed case mismatch<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/167> – Hodari

Issue #1363: Consider aligning to ISO structure<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1363/consider-aligning-to-iso-structure> – Hodari



Relating to Issue #1365: Document restructure<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1365/document-restructure>

PR #169 Move attachments to a separate document<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/169> – Dima

PR #171 Move verified claims to separate document<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/171>  - Mark

Issue #1358: Is the 'txn' element required or optional<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1358/is-the-txn-element-required-or-optional> – Dima

Issue #1371: Client Registration Metadata<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1371/client-registration-metadata> - Dima

                Issue #1373: Attachments: add an example of an attachment<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1373/attachments-add-an-example-of-an> – Dima

                Issue #1374: How can validity per claim be supported?<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1374/how-can-validity-per-claim-be-supported> - Mark





Advanced Syntax for Claims
                PR #172 - SAO, Second attempt<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/172> - Daniel





Authority
No Update

AOB



 Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ekyc-ida/attachments/20230906/39105255/attachment.html>