[OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Proposed eKYC and IDA WG Agenda for 20-07-2022

[Mark Haine]

Hi All,


Brief review of external Orgs & Events
                Discussion with Kristina about use of eKYC&IDA in VC context - Issue #1411<https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1411/specify-how-ekyc-ida-syntax-can-be-used> in AB Connect
               Any others to share?

Main Agenda Items
Any proposals?

Review PRs
PR #124<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/124> – Rename uk_diatf – Adrian
PR #123<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/123> – Definition of essential - Daniel
PR #122<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/122> – JSON Schema clarification - Mark
PR #121<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/121> – New Acknowledgements - Mark
PR #120<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/120> – Fix schema references - Torsten
PR #118<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/118> key retrieval clarification - Daniel
PR #114<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/114> ISO references - Taka


Review Issues

Issues in scope for ID4 and Final only at this stage



     Ready for closure

                None identified


     New *Determine which of these MUST or SHOULD be done for ID4 & Final

Issue #1312<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1312/clarity-about-extensions> – clarity about extensions - Mark



     Open but undecided about ID4
none



     Review
Currently tagged for ID4:
Issue #1311<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1311/unclear-definitions-for-requests> – unclear definitions for requests - Daniel
Issue #1261<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1261/> – JSON ‘null’ – Joseph

AOB






 Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ekyc-ida/attachments/20220720/3dfced6f/attachment.html>