[OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Proposed eKYC and IDA WG Agenda for 01-06-2022

[Mark Haine]

Hi All,

Brief review of external Orgs & Events
      Any to share?

Main Agenda Items
              Proposal to get to Final this year:
[Timeline  Description automatically generated]

  1.  NOT DO in Implementer’s Draft 4

     *   Anything in other drafts – ASC, Authority
     *   Anything that could or should be done as an extra draft or profile

                                                                                                   i.      New end-user claims

                                                                                                 ii.      Further enrichment to metadata

                                                                                               iii.      Richer error handling

                                                                                               iv.      Pending Verification

                                                                                                 v.      Pre-defined claims sets

     *   Most of the JSON Schema issues (except Issue #1287<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1287/>)
     *   Mapping to eIDAS
     *   Issue #1283<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1283/> – birth_date definition -> do in ASC
     *   Issue #1292<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1292/> - unique person identifiers -> other draft or profile

  1.  DO in Implementer’s Draft 4

     *   PR #112<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/112> - External attachment audience
     *   PR #114<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/114> - ISO references
     *   Issue #1300<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1300/update-document-history-after-12> – Document History & Acknowledgements
     *   Issue #1256<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1256/> – Clarification about retrieving keys
     *   Issue #1255<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1255/> – Section 5.3 clarifications
     *   Issue #1306<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1255/> – Identifier for UK DIATF
     *   Issue #1254<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1254/> –clarification about optional sub-elements
     *   Issue #1247<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1247/> – value/values
     *   Issue #1287<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1287/> – Broken reference in JSON Schema

  1.  Decide whether to include in Implementer’s Draft 4

     *   Issue #1261<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1261/> – JSON ‘null’
     *   Statement that JSON Schema is normative or not

Any other proposals?

PRs & Issues

     Review PRs

PR #112<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/112> – External attachment token audience – Taka

PR #114<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/114> – ISO references – Taka

                PR #115<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/115> – fix value/values – Daniel

                PR #116<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/116> – fix document structure – Daniel



 Review Issues

     Ready for closure


     New

                Issue #1307<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1307/section-76-has-html-rendering-issues> – Section 7.6 html render – Mark

                Issue #1308<https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/issues/1308/definition-implementation-of-essential> – essential claims handling - Joseph





     Review





 Mark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ekyc-ida/attachments/20220601/88c48cd2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 134317 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ekyc-ida/attachments/20220601/88c48cd2/attachment-0001.png>