[OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] claims and value(s) and age verification and etc
mhainework at googlemail.com
Tue Feb 23 17:09:45 UTC 2021
Thanks for the update and the contribution you have made in the PR comments, I think that delivers on your action. I think Daniel has moved things forward in this regard again with some focus on the problem statement and a number of options to consider. This seems in significant part in response to your words of concern. It would be great if you could have a look at what Daniel has contributed before the WG tomorrow.
> On 22 Feb 2021, at 22:59, Brian Campbell via Openid-specs-ekyc-ida <openid-specs-ekyc-ida at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> During the last call I said I'd put in an issue for my concern/confusion around what I perceived to be a departure from core OIDC's definition of the claims parameter. Honestly, I'm not sure how to do that - i.e. how to articulate it in a meaningful way or suggest any resolution. So I don't think I'm going to get an issue in. But I did try and share some thoughts in response to a prompt in a comment from Daniel: https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/42/age-verification#comment-207502545 <https://bitbucket.org/openid/ekyc-ida/pull-requests/42/age-verification#comment-207502545> , which I think is the best I can do with it at this point.
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you.--
> Openid-specs-ekyc-ida mailing list
> Openid-specs-ekyc-ida at lists.openid.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Openid-specs-ekyc-ida