[OpenID-Specs-eKYC-IDA] Issue #1188: Embedded liability implications in the framework? (openid/ekyc-ida)

Torsten Lodderstedt torsten at lodderstedt.net
Fri Mar 27 21:48:33 UTC 2020

> Am 27.03.2020 um 20:51 schrieb Anthony Nadalin via Openid-specs-ekyc-ida <openid-specs-ekyc-ida at lists.openid.net>:
> That said, a guarantee of some sort seems to me to be intrinsic to the concept of a “verified claim.” OPs that aren’t willing to accept any liability regarding verified claims probably shouldn’t be issuing them. Why would an OP issue verified claims if it isn’t willing to stand by them? What value would those be to the RP? Isn’t a verified claim without a guarantee just a “claim”?

I fully agree.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2275 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ekyc-ida/attachments/20200327/08013c79/attachment.p7s>

More information about the Openid-specs-ekyc-ida mailing list