<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=en-DE link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I support draft 27 proceeding to public review<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=DE style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Christian<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span style='color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='color:black'>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net> on behalf of Lee Campbell via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br><b>Date: </b>Thursday, 24. April 2025 at 16:07<br><b>To: </b>Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br><b>Cc: </b>Lee Campbell <leecam@google.com><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div id=mail-editor-reference-message-container><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#242424'>I support draft 27 moving to public review.</span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#242424'>Cheers</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#242424'>Lee</span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 5:24<span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> </span>AM Oliver Terbu via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><div><div><p style='margin:0cm;background:white'><span style='font-size:11.0pt;color:#242424'>I support draft 27 moving to public review.</span><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div><div class=MsoNormal align=center style='text-align:center'><hr size=0 width="99%" align=center></div><div id="m_577693778029330704divRplyFwdMsg"><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:black'> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net</a>> on behalf of Daniel Fett via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>><br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 24, 2025 9:25 AM<br><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a> <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>><br><b>Cc:</b> Daniel Fett <<a href="mailto:mail@danielfett.de">mail@danielfett.de</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP</span> <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><div style='border:solid #9C6500 1.0pt;padding:2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt 2.0pt' id="m_577693778029330704x_footer"><p class=MsoNormal style='background:#FFEB9C'><span style='font-size:7.5pt;color:black'>EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside of our organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.</span><span style='font-size:7.5pt'><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p>+1<o:p></o:p></p><p>-Daniel<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Am 24.04.25 um 08:41 schrieb torsten--- via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div name="x_messageBodySection"><div><p class=MsoNormal>I believe draft 27 should proceed to public review.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div name="x_messageSignatureSection"><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>best regards, <o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Torsten.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><div name="x_messageReplySection"><p class=MsoNormal>Am 23. Apr. 2025, 00:53 +0200 schrieb Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net"><openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net></a>:<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><blockquote style='margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear DCP Working Group Members,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>As discussed on today’s (yesterday now for some of you!) working group call (and as per my email) we would like to start a get WG consensus that the current OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Please respond to this email within the next 2 days, by end of Thursday 22nd April, whether you believe the current draft should proceed to the public review or not. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>There is one normative PRs that we agreed during the working group meeting to work on during working group last call (just waiting for final reviews please!):<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Rename authorization_encrypted_response_enc parameter <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The above should resolve the point Mike Jones raised during WGLC.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>There’s an ongoing attempt to understand Tom Jones’s issue raised during WGLC.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>There’s also a few non-breaking improvements in PRs that may be merged before public review.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The details of the specification approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/">https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Kindest Regards,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Editors & Chairs<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>--<br>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>-- <br>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></body></html>