<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <p>+1</p>
    <p>-Daniel<br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 24.04.25 um 08:41 schrieb torsten---
      via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:e4786ffe-c9b3-4349-84b5-93a43a3cff68@Spark">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <title></title>
      <div name="messageBodySection">
        <div dir="auto">I believe draft 27 should proceed to public
          review.</div>
      </div>
      <div name="messageSignatureSection"><br>
        <div class="matchFont">best regards, 
          <div dir="auto">Torsten.</div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <div name="messageReplySection">Am 23. Apr. 2025, 00:53 +0200
        schrieb Joseph Heenan via
        Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
        <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net"><openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net></a>:<br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
style="border-left-color: grey; border-left-width: thin; border-left-style: solid; margin: 5px 5px;padding-left: 10px;">
          <meta http-equiv="content-type"
            content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
          <div
style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">
            <div>Dear DCP Working Group Members,</div>
            <div>                                                       
                                           </div>
            <div>As discussed on today’s (yesterday now for some of
              you!) working group call (and as per my email) we would
              like to start a get WG consensus that the current
              OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification
              approval process.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Please respond to this email within the next 2 days, by
              end of Thursday 22nd April, whether you believe the
              current draft should proceed to the public review or not. </div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found
              here: <a
href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html</a></div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>There is one normative PRs that we agreed during the
              working group meeting to work on during working group last
              call (just waiting for final reviews please!):</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Rename authorization_encrypted_response_enc parameter <a
                href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls"
                moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls</a> </div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>The above should resolve the point Mike Jones raised
              during WGLC.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>There’s an ongoing attempt to understand Tom Jones’s
              issue raised during WGLC.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>There’s also a few non-breaking improvements in PRs
              that may be merged before public review.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>If there are other topics working group members think
              need to be handled before the specification moves to final
              please reply to this email with details.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is
              likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review
              period that the working group chooses to fix before the
              voting period starts.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>The details of the specification approval process can
              be found here:
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/">https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>This email is about the first bullet point on this list
              "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide
              approval of the draft specification", which is often
              called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).</div>
            <div>The following steps are to start a 60-day
              Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting
              period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of
              the Foundation-wide review ends).</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Kindest Regards,</div>
            <div>Editors & Chairs</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          --<br>
          Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br>
          <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>