<div dir="ltr"><span style="color:rgb(36,36,36);font-family:Aptos,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">I support draft 27 moving to public review.</span><div><span style="color:rgb(36,36,36);font-family:Aptos,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(36,36,36);font-family:Aptos,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">Cheers</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(36,36,36);font-family:Aptos,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px">Lee</span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(36,36,36);font-family:Aptos,sans-serif;font-size:14.6667px"><br></span></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 5:24 AM Oliver Terbu via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="msg-2286925787968770445">
<div dir="ltr">
<p style="text-align:left;text-indent:0px;background-color:rgb(255,255,255);margin:0px">
<span style="font-family:Aptos,sans-serif;font-size:11pt;color:rgb(36,36,36)">I support draft 27 moving to public review.</span></p>
<div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:Aptos,Aptos_EmbeddedFont,Aptos_MSFontService,Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt;color:rgb(0,0,0)">
<br>
</div>
<div id="m_577693778029330704appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div id="m_577693778029330704divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net</a>> on behalf of Daniel Fett
via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, April 24, 2025 9:25 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a> <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Daniel Fett <<a href="mailto:mail@danielfett.de" target="_blank">mail@danielfett.de</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="m_577693778029330704x_footer" style="background-color:rgb(255,235,156);width:100%;font-size:10px;border:1px solid rgb(156,101,0);padding:2pt">
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside of our organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.</div>
<br>
<div>
<p>+1</p>
<p>-Daniel<br>
</p>
<div>Am 24.04.25 um 08:41 schrieb torsten--- via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div name="x_messageBodySection">
<div dir="auto">I believe draft 27 should proceed to public review.</div>
</div>
<div name="x_messageSignatureSection"><br>
<div>best regards,
<div dir="auto">Torsten.</div>
</div>
</div>
<div name="x_messageReplySection">Am 23. Apr. 2025, 00:53 +0200 schrieb Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">
<openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net></a>:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" style="border-left:thin solid grey;margin:5px;padding-left:10px">
<div>
<div>Dear DCP Working Group Members,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>As discussed on today’s (yesterday now for some of you!) working group call (and as per my email) we would like to start a get WG consensus that the current OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please respond to this email within the next 2 days, by end of Thursday 22nd April, whether you believe the current draft should proceed to the public review or not. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html" target="_blank">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There is one normative PRs that we agreed during the working group meeting to work on during working group last call (just waiting for final reviews please!):</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Rename authorization_encrypted_response_enc parameter <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls</a> </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The above should resolve the point Mike Jones raised during WGLC.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There’s an ongoing attempt to understand Tom Jones’s issue raised during WGLC.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There’s also a few non-breaking improvements in PRs that may be merged before public review.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The details of the specification approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/" target="_blank">
https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).</div>
<div>The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kindest Regards,</div>
<div>Editors & Chairs</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
--<br>
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset></fieldset> </blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
-- <br>
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><br>
</div></blockquote></div>