<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<p class="elementToProof" style="text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); margin: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(36, 36, 36);">I agree, draft 26 should proceed to public review.</span></p>
<p class="elementToProof" style="text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); margin: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(36, 36, 36);"><br>
</span></p>
<p class="elementToProof" style="text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); margin: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(36, 36, 36);">Thanks,</span></p>
<p class="elementToProof" style="text-align: left; text-indent: 0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); margin: 0px;">
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(36, 36, 36);">Oliver</span></p>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net> on behalf of Tom Jones via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, April 18, 2025 5:35 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="x_footer" style="background-color:#ffeb9c; width:100%; font-size:10px; border:1px solid #FFEB9C; padding:2pt; border-style:solid; border-color:#9C6500">
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside of our organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.</div>
<br>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>i do not believe the spec is ready.</div>
<div>see <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/333">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/333</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr"><font face="-apple-system, system-ui, system-ui, Segoe UI, Roboto, Helvetica Neue, Fira Sans, Ubuntu, Oxygen, Oxygen Sans, Cantarell, Droid Sans, Apple Color Emoji, Segoe UI Emoji, Segoe UI Symbol, Lucida Grande, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif" color="#38761d"><span style="font-size:14px; background-color:rgb(242,242,242)">Peace
..tom jones</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote x_gmail_quote_container">
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_attr">On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 2:12 PM Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<div>
<div>Dear DCP Working Group Members,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html" target="_blank">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. revamp vp formats: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459</a> (a separate email about this will follow shortly.)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The details of the specification approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/" target="_blank">
https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).</div>
<div>The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kindest Regards,</div>
<div>Editors & Chairs</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
-- <br>
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>