<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
I support moving the draft to public review.</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net> on behalf of Joseph Heenan
via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, 12 April 2025 23:11<br>
<b>To:</b> Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Joseph Heenan <joseph@authlete.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div style="line-break:after-white-space">
<div style="line-break:after-white-space">
<div>Dear DCP Working Group Members,</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>1. revamp vp formats: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459</a> (a separate email about this will follow shortly.)</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The details of the specification approval process can be found here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).</div>
<div>The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kindest Regards,</div>
<div>Editors & Chairs</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>