<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;
mso-ligatures:none;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=en-DE link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I agree, draft 26 should proceed to public review.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I believe that a bit more editorial work to clean up some parts is necessary, but that should not hinder proceeding to the public review imho.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Best Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-GB style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Christian<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div id=mail-editor-reference-message-container><div><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b><span style='color:black'>From: </span></b><span style='color:black'>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net> on behalf of Paul Bastian via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br><b>Date: </b>Sunday, 13. April 2025 at 12:46<br><b>To: </b>Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br><b>Cc: </b>Paul Bastian <paul.bastian@posteo.de><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>I think draft 26 is ready to proceed to public review. <o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p>12 Apr 2025 23:17:16 Stefan Charsley via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net>:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 2.25pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:0cm;margin-right:0cm'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I believe draft 26 should proceed with public review. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Regards <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Stefan Charsley <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, 14:12 Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols, <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote: <o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear DCP Working Group Members, <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call: <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>1. revamp vp formats: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539</a> <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459</a> (a separate email about this will follow shortly.) <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The details of the specification approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/">https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC). <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends). <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Kindest Regards, <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Editors & Chairs <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>-- <br>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list <br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a> <br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a> <o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></div></body></html>