<html>
<head>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
</head>
<body>
<span dir="ltr" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;">I think draft 26 is ready to proceed to public review.</span>
<br>
<div class="fairemail_quote">
<div dir="ltr">
<p>12 Apr 2025 23:17:16 Stefan Charsley via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net>:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin:0;border-left:3px solid #ccc; padding-left:10px;">
<div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">
I believe draft 26 should proceed with public review.
</div>
<div data-smartmail="gmail_signature" dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr">
<br>
<div>
Regards
</div>
<div>
Stefan Charsley
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container" dir="auto">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, 14:12 Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols, <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote:
<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div style="line-break:after-white-space;">
<div style="line-break:after-white-space;">
<div>
Dear DCP Working Group Members,
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
1. revamp vp formats: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539</a>
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459</a> (a separate email about this will follow shortly.)
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
The details of the specification approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
</div>
<div>
The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Kindest Regards,
</div>
<div>
Editors & Chairs
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>--
<br>
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
<br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>
<br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>