<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=en-DE link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=en-DE style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I support moving HAIP to Implementers Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=en-DE style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=en-DE style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Best Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=en-DE style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Christian<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=en-DE style='mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif'> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces@lists.openid.net> <b>On Behalf Of </b>Lee Campbell via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols<br><b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, 5 February 2025 21:28<br><b>To:</b> Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net><br><b>Cc:</b> Lee Campbell <leecam@google.com><br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for HAIP First Implementers Draft<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>I support moving forward <o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Thu, Feb 6, 2025, 7:15<span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> </span>AM <a href="mailto:torsten@lodderstedt.net" target="_blank">torsten@lodderstedt.net</a> via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm'><div><div name=messageBodySection><div><p class=MsoNormal>I support moving HAIP to implementers draft.<o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div name=messageReplySection><div><p class=MsoNormal>Am 5. Feb. 2025, 00:25 +0100 schrieb Bjorn Hjelm via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>>:<br> <o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #1ABC9C 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal>I support moving HAIP to Implementer’s Draft given the reasoning provided by DCP WG Chairs on today’s call.<o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #1ABC9C 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Kind Regards,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Bjorn<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #1ABC9C 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #E67E22 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Feb 5, 2025, at 8:08<span style='font-family:"Arial",sans-serif'> </span>AM, Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <<a href="mailto:openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a>> wrote:<br><br> <o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #E67E22 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Dear Working Group,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>As discussed on the Thursday working group call last week (and also on today’s working group call) we would like to get WG consensus that the current HAIP draft is ready to start the Implementer’s draft approval process.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Please respond to this email <strong><span style='font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif'>within the next 2 days, by Thur Feb 6th end of business hours in PST</span></strong>, whether you believe the current draft should proceed to the public review or not. (Apologies that we didn’t manage to get this email out after the Thursday call as originally discussed!)<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The HAIP document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.github.io/oid4vc-haip/openid4vc-high-assurance-interoperability-profile-wg-draft.html" target="_blank">https://openid.github.io/oid4vc-haip/openid4vc-high-assurance-interoperability-profile-wg-draft.html</a><o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The primary reason for starting the (somewhat lengthy) implementer’s draft process at this point is that doing so now is the only way to publish an implementer’s draft and still hit the timeline to publish a final version of the spec by the end of June, which we want to do in order to hit the timelines promised to the EU, ISO, etc.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>We certainly don’t view this spec as final - this is very much just a step on the journey, and there may well be comments that arrive during the 45 day public review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts. There are also a number of open issues in the GitHub issue tracker that the working group wants to solve before we take HAIP to final (you can see the list currently tagged for 1.0 Final here: <a href="https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/milestone/2" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/milestone/2</a> - please let the chairs know if you think anything is missing from that list).<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>I feel having the public review period and receiving that feedback from a wider group of people is very important to ensuring the spec is the best it can be by the time it goes to final.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The details of the Implementer’s draft approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/" target="_blank">https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>This email is about the first bullet point on this list, which is sometimes called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>The next steps are to start a 45-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends). If all goes smoothly the official 7 day voting period will hopefully start on Mon 24th March.<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'> <o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Kindest Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Editors & Chairs<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #1ABC9C 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><blockquote style='border:none;border-left:solid #E67E22 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 8.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:3.75pt;margin-right:3.75pt;margin-bottom:3.75pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>Note that, a 7 days WGLC review period would have meant that a 45 days review would start on 24th of December, which overlaps with the Holidays. Therefore, also taking into account that it has been discussed a number of times and agreed in the WG that the WG would like to start the WGLC of OpenID4VCI once two specific PRs are merged, the DCP WG made a decision on Dec 17th WG call to do WGLC in 2 days<o:p></o:p></span></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>--<br>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><br> <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></blockquote></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>--<br>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><br> <o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div></div><p class=MsoNormal>-- <br>Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net" target="_blank">Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net</a><br><a href="https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols" target="_blank">https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols</a><o:p></o:p></p></blockquote></div></div></body></html>