<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">Hi all,</span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif"><br></span></div><div dir="ltr"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">Below is the suggested agenda for tomorrow's DCP WG call.</span></div><div><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif"><br>First, few announcements:</span></div><div dir="ltr"><div>1.Vote to Approve Proposed Second Implementer’s Draft of OpenID for Verifiable Credential Issuance Specification has started: <a href="https://openid.net/foundation/members/polls/349" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://openid.net/foundation/members/polls/349</a></div><div><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div name="messageBodySection"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">2. All <b>OpenID4VCI issues have been labelled </b>or marked pending close - here are those labelled<b> Final 1.0</b> (those that might result in a breaking change depending on how we decide to address, or those that chairs are aware are a priority): <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22</a> Please bring it up if you believe any of the issue is mislabeled (on the ML, in the issue, on the call or send a note to the chairs). </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div><b>3. Issues in OpenID4VP / OpenID4VCI / HAIP repos that are labelled `ready-for-PR`,</b> <b>are ready for PR</b>. Please volunteer to do PRs for them. (Ping Kristina if you know which one you would like to do and I can assign it to you).</div><div><br></div></div><ol type="1"><li style="font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">OIDF Antitrust Policy at </span><a href="http://www.openid.net/antitrust" target="_blank" style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">www.openid.net/antitrust</a><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif"> applies</span></li><li style="font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">IPR reminder/ Note-taking</span></li><li style="font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">Introductions/re-introductions</span></li><li style="font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">Agenda bashing/adoption</span></li><li style="font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">Events/External orgs</span></li><li>ISO virtual mtg update </li><ol><li>(please see email with a title "A short summary of today's virtual ISO mtg's outcome Re: Documents circulated to ISO SC17 WG10")</li><li>issues raised as an outcome of this ISO virtual mtg: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3AISO_VirtualMeeting">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3AISO_VirtualMeeting</a></li></ol><li><div>starting a 7-day WGLC for the First Implementer's Draft for HAIP. That would give the WG enough time to work on the ID-1 for HAIP before doing Final 1.0 of HAIP. Heads up that to publish Final 1.0 specification before the end of June, we need to start 7-day WGLC for OpenID4VP/OpenID4VCI/HAIP around Wednesday 2 April 2025.</div></li><ol type="a"></ol><li style="font-size:13px"><span style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",sans-serif">OID4VP / HAIP: Continue ISO-related priority topics:</span></li><ul><li>multi RP request: discuss "If the RP sends a request with multiple client identifiers for one or more mdocs, how is it supposed to figure out which client identifier to use for checking the session transcript in the respective device response?": <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/308" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/308</a></li></ul><li>please review priority PRs for OpenID4VP: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Final+1.0%22" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Final+1.0%22</a></li><ol><li>we should also resume discussion on this PR, since it is an EUDIW requirement: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/318" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/318</a></li></ol><li>please review priority issues for OpenID4VP 1.0 that do not have a resolution yet: <a href="https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20-label%3Ahas-PR%20-label%3Aready-for-PR%20" target="_blank">https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20-label%3Ahas-PR%20-label%3Aready-for-PR%20</a></li><ul></ul></ol><div>Thank you!</div><div>Kristina</div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div></div>