<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I am in favour of adoption</p>
<p>David<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/01/2025 01:27, Joseph Heenan via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:146E772E-CCC4-4478-A7E0-84F50D659835@authlete.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div
style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">Hi
all
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>As discussed in various recent WG meetings the OpenID
for Verifiable Presentations specification currently
technically belongs to the Connect/AB working group (as it
was started before the DCP WG existed), so now the
specification has moved to Implementer’s Draft 3 (and the
IPR protections locked in) we need to do a “call for
adoption” to move it to the Digital Credentials Protocols
working group.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is an official call for adoption of “OpenID for
Verifiable Presentations” document: <a
href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-ID3.html"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-ID3.html</a>.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please reply on the mailing list and let us know if you
are in favor or against adopting this draft as a WG
document, by Jan 17th.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Many thanks</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Joseph</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>