<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto">I am in favor of adoption
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Kind regards </div>
<div dir="auto">Niels Klomp</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 3 Jan 2025 20:02, David Chadwick via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net> wrote:<br type="attribution">
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p>I am in favour of adoption</p>
<p>David<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/01/2025 01:27, Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div style="line-break:after-white-space">Hi all
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>As discussed in various recent WG meetings the OpenID for Verifiable Presentations specification currently technically belongs to the Connect/AB working group (as it was started before the DCP WG existed), so now the specification has moved to Implementer’s
Draft 3 (and the IPR protections locked in) we need to do a “call for adoption” to move it to the Digital Credentials Protocols working group.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This is an official call for adoption of “OpenID for Verifiable Presentations” document: <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-ID3.html" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-ID3.html</a>.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please reply on the mailing list and let us know if you are in favor or against adopting this draft as a WG document, by Jan 17th.</div>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Many thanks</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Joseph</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset> </blockquote>
</div>
</body>
</html>