<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="overflow-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;">
I support OpenID4VCI proceeding to Implementors Draft.
<div><br id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfMessage">
<div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Ben Piercey</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: 400; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
CTO - AffinitiQuest</div>
</div>
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>On Dec 17, 2024, at 4:26 PM, Kristina Yasuda via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Dear Working Group,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>We would like to get WG consensus that the current OpenID4VCI draft is ready to start the Implementer’s draft approval process.</div>
<div>Please respond to this email <b>within the next 2 days, by Dec 19th end of business hours in PST</b>, whether you believe the current draft should proceed or not. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The OpenID4VCI document to be reviewed can be found here: <a href="https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VCI/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-wg-draft.html" originalsrc="https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VCI/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-wg-draft.html" shash="DtFhJnePFo99noG1poe6SaiKRzW8NC+nvNdordf8ei7oOxz66xty6GKvZwx3mzTsRbHjwvPPiuVoysToiSs+6jHNJNOIu9wzs75XG1ccCNoxXAaE3Sh5Lndf/I8UzlyZwP3dmYdP8XypORwn0Wlb2zOwlCKqwj+CqqpjcXt3wP4=" target="_blank">https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VCI/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-wg-draft.html</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>The details of the Implementer’s draft approval process can be found here: <a href="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/" originalsrc="https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/" shash="XgGme2rhcianj1Ejpf57wHoSSq0Xb1WfSyIWLDPc4glPNIrGoq9cKWDj++2qTd1JabJczqUpdLVZn3UMoa/kMEeVrJo8T/luNka0+BTQrumduEdPZPOv08p9+Lgb8sonT6S9xRMGHbUeu12KwkACaexYKiS0l3zCq72rlZkZ9+8=" target="_blank">https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/</a>.</div>
<div>This email is about the first bullet point on this list, which is sometimes called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).</div>
<div>The next steps are to start a 45-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends). If all goes smoothly the voting will hopefully start on Mon 3rd February.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Kindest Regards,</div>
<div>Editors & Chairs</div>
</div>
<br>
<div>Note that, a 7 days WGLC review period would have meant that a 45 days review would start on 24th of December, which overlaps with the Holidays. Therefore, also taking into account that it has been discussed a number of times and agreed in the WG that
the WG would like to start the WGLC of OpenID4VCI once two specific PRs are merged, the DCP WG made a decision on Dec 17th WG call to do WGLC in 2 days</div>
</div>
-- <br>
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list<br>
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols@lists.openid.net<br>
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</body>
</html>