[Openid-dcp] DCP WG APAC 20th November 2025 Meeting Notes
Stefan Charsley
charsleysa at gmail.com
Thu Nov 20 08:10:13 UTC 2025
DCP WG APAC 20th November 2025
Attendees
Valentine Mazurov
Kenichi Nakamura
Hiroyuki Sano
Joseph Heenan
Stefan Charsley
Andres Olave
Updates
ISO interop event in NZ 16/17th November, tested HAIP with/without DC API
and mdocs, not everyone had fully implemented HAIP 1.0
OpenID interop event had high success rates
ISO working group meeting ongoing this week. some discussion on how to
better collaborate between ISO WG and DCP WG
DCP meetings next week likely to be canceled since large number of people
on holiday
HAIP public review completing 8th Dec
Doodle poll for figuring out new times for WG meetings to reduce meetings
down to 2 per week https://doodle.com/group-poll/participate/eEQkzpWe
HAIP
Make A128GCM and A256GCM mandatory for the verifier, make either mandatory
for the wallet #343 <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/343>
-
Add comments if any or approvals
Make clear that digital sig section applies to jwt proof type too #346
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/346>
-
Add comments if any or approvals
Replace 'Annex' with 'Appendix' when referring to OIDF documents #347
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/347>
-
More approvals needed
Capitalise ecosystem #349
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/349>
-
More approvals needed
Add the multi-signed option to the dc api section #350
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/350>
-
Add comments if any or approvals
add compatibility note about pre-final specifications #299
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/issues/299>
-
Stefan: I prefer version 14, it’s least likely to have breaking changes
between 14 and final
-
Andres: agreed
-
Kenichi: agreed
-
Valentine: agreed
General
-
Kenichi: how is the hpke work going?
-
Joseph: there isn’t currently a way to do hpke in VP. there’s two
possible options, option 1 - new response mode (see VP#676
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/676>), option 2 - there is a
IETF spec to use hpke with JWE, unfortunately not finished yet, already
been waiting for about 18 months and still has a non-insignificant amount
of work to be done. Need to decide as a working group what to recommend,
some feedback of preference not to wait for IETF. please provide feedback
-
Kenichi: I prefer to use session transcript for hpke approach
-
Stefan: if people could please take a look at HAIP#348
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/issues/348> and decide/comment
if anything needs to be done/clarified
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20251120/51682d77/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
mailing list