[Openid-dcp] Working group last call for OpenID4VC High Assurance Interoperability Profile / Notice for Consensus Decision at 24th October DCP WG call on moving VCI into public review & foundation wide voting for final

[Dirk Balfanz]

I support moving HAIP to public review.

Dirk.


On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 4:56 PM Timo Glastra via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> I also support moving the current HAIP draft to go to public review
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Timo Glastra*
>
> *Co-Founder | **Animo Solutions*
> https://animo.id
>
>
>
> Op wo 5 nov 2025 om 22:02 schreef Fabian Aggeler via
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
>
>> I support moving the current HAIP draft to go to public review.
>>
>> Best,
>> Fabian
>>
>> *From: *Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces at lists.openid.net> on
>> behalf of Kristina Yasuda via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
>> *Date: *Wednesday, 5 November 2025 at 21:19
>> *To: *Digital Credentials Protocols List <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
>> *Cc: *Kristina Yasuda <yasudakristina at gmail.com>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Openid-dcp] Working group last call for OpenID4VC High
>> Assurance Interoperability Profile / Notice for Consensus Decision at 24th
>> October DCP WG call on moving VCI into public review & foundation wide
>> voting for final
>>
>> I support moving HAIP to public review!
>>
>> Best,
>> Kristina
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:36 AM Jan Vereecken via
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>
>> I support moving HAIP to public review.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jan Vereecken
>> ------------------------------
>> *From:* Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces at lists.openid.net> on
>> behalf of Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 October 2025 18:05
>> *To:* Digital Credentials Protocols List <
>> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
>> *Cc:* Joseph Heenan <joseph at authlete.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Openid-dcp] Working group last call for OpenID4VC High
>> Assurance Interoperability Profile / Notice for Consensus Decision at 24th
>> October DCP WG call on moving VCI into public review & foundation wide
>> voting for final
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Unfortunately the chairs forgot to call the vote at the 24th October
>> meeting - many apologies! We’ve consulted with OIDF staff on how to proceed
>> and easiest & fairest option permitted by the process seems to be to hold
>> the vote via email instead. The email vote will run for 7 days, from today
>> until the end of Wednesday 5th November.
>>
>> Please reply to this thread to confirm if you believe the HAIP spec is
>> good to proceed to public review/foundation wide voting for 1.0 final, or
>> abstain, or object.
>>
>> For clarity: the chairs have not received any feedback to date that
>> indicates otherwise. We have received various pieces of feedback that don’t
>> affect the intended normative meaning of the text and that we suggest the
>> WG addresses during public review, these are shown here:
>> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/milestone/2
>>
>> (Forgetting to hold the vote on Friday won’t affect the timelines for
>> publishing 1.0 final, because public review was running in parallel with
>> the WGLC as permitted by OIDF process.)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>>
>> On 8 Oct 2025, at 11:10, Joseph Heenan <joseph at authlete.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all
>>
>> As discussed on yesterday's WG call (and in my email last week
>> <https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/Week-of-Mon-20250929/000960.html>),
>> as per table 2 in the OIDF process document,
>> https://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/OIDF_Process-Document_Final_2024-10-19.pdf,
>> we are starting WG last call for HAIP today, and plan (if the WG agrees) to
>> start the 60 day public review on Thursday 9th Oct.
>>
>> We then have a formal "core decision" to make of "recommend a Work Group
>> Draft as (…) a Final Specification” - specifically we need to agree that
>> the upcoming revision draft 5 of HAIP (which should be published shortly)
>> will go into public review and then be voted upon in a foundation wide
>> vote, to become final. This will be a consensus decision made at the 24th
>> October DCP WG call (the hybrid meeting happening on the Friday of the IIW
>> week). This email is a formal 14 day notice that we will make that decision
>> at that meeting. As allowed by the process document, this notice period
>> will run in parallel with the public review period, which we hope to start
>> on Thursday 9th October, and to ensure the working group feels we’re ready
>> we plan to also collect an informal consensus at the Thursday 9th October
>> June EU working group call.
>>
>> The spec to be reviewed can be found here:
>>
>>
>> https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VC-HAIP/openid4vc-high-assurance-interoperability-profile-wg-draft.html
>>
>> There are two PRs (one normative and one non-normative) that the WG
>> agreed to make the final changes to whilst this WGLC is in progress:
>>
>> enforce same device flow for redirect-based OpenID4VP
>> <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/293>
>>
>> Ecosystem Guidance <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/300>
>>
>> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled
>> before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with
>> details.
>>
>> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that
>> comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group
>> chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
>>
>> The details of the specification approval process can be found here:
>> https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/. This email is
>> about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus
>> to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is
>> often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC). The following steps are to
>> start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 14 day voting period.
>>
>> If all goes to plan this would result in Final being published around
>> Christmas time.
>>
>> Thank you to everyone that helped in getting us to this point.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Joseph
>>
>>
>> --
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>>
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>>
>> --
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>>
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20251105/b01c2226/attachment-0001.htm>