[Openid-dcp] Working group last call for OpenID4VC High Assurance Interoperability Profile / Notice for Consensus Decision at 24th October DCP WG call on moving VCI into public review & foundation wide voting for final

[Timo Glastra]

I also support moving the current HAIP draft to go to public review

Best regards,

*Timo Glastra*

*Co-Founder | **Animo Solutions*
https://animo.id



Op wo 5 nov 2025 om 22:02 schreef Fabian Aggeler via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>

> I support moving the current HAIP draft to go to public review.
>
> Best,
> Fabian
>
> *From: *Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces at lists.openid.net> on
> behalf of Kristina Yasuda via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
> *Date: *Wednesday, 5 November 2025 at 21:19
> *To: *Digital Credentials Protocols List <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
> *Cc: *Kristina Yasuda <yasudakristina at gmail.com>
> *Subject: *Re: [Openid-dcp] Working group last call for OpenID4VC High
> Assurance Interoperability Profile / Notice for Consensus Decision at 24th
> October DCP WG call on moving VCI into public review & foundation wide
> voting for final
>
> I support moving HAIP to public review!
>
> Best,
> Kristina
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:36 AM Jan Vereecken via
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
> I support moving HAIP to public review.
>
> Regards,
> Jan Vereecken
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces at lists.openid.net> on
> behalf of Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 29 October 2025 18:05
> *To:* Digital Credentials Protocols List <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
> *Cc:* Joseph Heenan <joseph at authlete.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Openid-dcp] Working group last call for OpenID4VC High
> Assurance Interoperability Profile / Notice for Consensus Decision at 24th
> October DCP WG call on moving VCI into public review & foundation wide
> voting for final
>
> Hi all
>
> Unfortunately the chairs forgot to call the vote at the 24th October
> meeting - many apologies! We’ve consulted with OIDF staff on how to proceed
> and easiest & fairest option permitted by the process seems to be to hold
> the vote via email instead. The email vote will run for 7 days, from today
> until the end of Wednesday 5th November.
>
> Please reply to this thread to confirm if you believe the HAIP spec is
> good to proceed to public review/foundation wide voting for 1.0 final, or
> abstain, or object.
>
> For clarity: the chairs have not received any feedback to date that
> indicates otherwise. We have received various pieces of feedback that don’t
> affect the intended normative meaning of the text and that we suggest the
> WG addresses during public review, these are shown here:
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/milestone/2
>
> (Forgetting to hold the vote on Friday won’t affect the timelines for
> publishing 1.0 final, because public review was running in parallel with
> the WGLC as permitted by OIDF process.)
>
> Thanks
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On 8 Oct 2025, at 11:10, Joseph Heenan <joseph at authlete.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> As discussed on yesterday's WG call (and in my email last week
> <https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/Week-of-Mon-20250929/000960.html>),
> as per table 2 in the OIDF process document,
> https://openid.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/OIDF_Process-Document_Final_2024-10-19.pdf,
> we are starting WG last call for HAIP today, and plan (if the WG agrees) to
> start the 60 day public review on Thursday 9th Oct.
>
> We then have a formal "core decision" to make of "recommend a Work Group
> Draft as (…) a Final Specification” - specifically we need to agree that
> the upcoming revision draft 5 of HAIP (which should be published shortly)
> will go into public review and then be voted upon in a foundation wide
> vote, to become final. This will be a consensus decision made at the 24th
> October DCP WG call (the hybrid meeting happening on the Friday of the IIW
> week). This email is a formal 14 day notice that we will make that decision
> at that meeting. As allowed by the process document, this notice period
> will run in parallel with the public review period, which we hope to start
> on Thursday 9th October, and to ensure the working group feels we’re ready
> we plan to also collect an informal consensus at the Thursday 9th October
> June EU working group call.
>
> The spec to be reviewed can be found here:
>
>
> https://openid.github.io/OpenID4VC-HAIP/openid4vc-high-assurance-interoperability-profile-wg-draft.html
>
> There are two PRs (one normative and one non-normative) that the WG agreed
> to make the final changes to whilst this WGLC is in progress:
>
> enforce same device flow for redirect-based OpenID4VP
> <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/293>
>
> Ecosystem Guidance <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/300>
>
> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled
> before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with
> details.
>
> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that
> comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group
> chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
>
> The details of the specification approval process can be found here:
> https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/. This email is
> about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus
> to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is
> often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC). The following steps are to
> start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 14 day voting period.
>
> If all goes to plan this would result in Final being published around
> Christmas time.
>
> Thank you to everyone that helped in getting us to this point.
>
> Thanks
>
> Joseph
>
>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20251105/91a8ec9f/attachment.htm>