[Openid-dcp] DCP WG APAC 25th September 2025 Meeting Notes
Stefan Charsley
charsleysa at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 08:16:34 UTC 2025
DCP WG APAC 25th September 2025
Attendees
Amineh Akhavan
Philip Halsall
Hiroyuki Sano
Klaus Roehrle
Joseph Heenan
Stefan Charsley
Dima Postnikov
Updates
HAIP working group last call aimed for next week. Specs need to be final
for EU by december.
VCI
Initial 1.1 draft #657 <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/657>
-
Stefan: would be good to be able to clearly see what changes there are
vs 1.0
HAIP
Require use of (most of) FAPI2 with VCI #214
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/214>
-
Just waiting for paul to approve/clear review
What does High Assurance mean? #231
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/231>
-
Needs more reviews
Reword SD-JWT credential validity text #276
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/276>
-
Needs more approvals
Remove requirement that SD-JWT iss is a https url #277
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/277>
-
Needs more approvals
Attempt to clarify which sections/flows are mandatory #278
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/278>
-
Needs more reviews, especially Martijn
Add guidance around key sizes #280
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/280>
-
Needs more reviews, some discussion on whether it should be normative
Add same 'Requirements Notation and Conventions' as used in VCI #281
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/281>
-
Has 3 approvals, can be merged after 7 days
Resolve issue with conflicting 'MUST' & 'SHOULD' for key attestations #282
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/282>
-
Needs more reviews
add requirement on status list index uniqueness #288
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/pull/288>
-
Needs more reviews
Limit options supported for the format and resolution method for image
based assets in credential issuer metadata #185
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/issues/185>
-
Stefan: will both svg and png be mandatory for wallet/verifier to
support?
-
Joseph: effectively yes, issuer would choose which to use
Add security considerations section #163
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/issues/163>
-
If anyone has any security considerations, please comment
allow use of other wallet attestations formats? #211
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/issues/211>:
-
Needs more discussion
consider adding MTI crypto suites #112
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VC-HAIP/issues/112>
-
Needs more input
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250925/1cf4e71a/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
mailing list