[Openid-dcp] [EXT] Results of 6/17 Interop: OpenID4VP v29 + DC API+ DCQL

[Joseph Heenan]

Hi Alan, Gail,

That’s correct yes - the new tests are generally available but the instructions are lagging a little behind what’s actually available. I just updated the instructions to mention that tests are available for -29, but they are probably still rough edges in the instructions.

The latest update on the available tests is the one I sent to the working group last week: https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/Week-of-Mon-20250630/000859.html

Thanks

Joseph


On 7 Jul 2025, at 21:05, Gail Hodges <gail at oidf.org> wrote:

Hi Alan

Yes, anyone can run the tests, it is not restricted to those participating in the interops so far.

The tests have been updated for v29 but the copy on the oidf website is out of date. I believe you want to just follow the instructions on the link, go to the demo site, and click create a new test plan, and then  you select the “final” test plan. It does not say it covers v29 in the test plan title - but it does.  In fact, it should work for builds to v24 and v29, but we advise you build to v29 since that is the version we expect to be final when member vote concludes July 9th. The image I copied below would be the test plan for the verifier side.

If you have feedback or issues running the tests, then you can most swiftly get feedback from the OIDF slack thread at #openid4vp-browser-api-feedback.

@Joseph Heenan<mailto:joseph.heenan at oidf.org> please correct me if I have anything wrong.

Gail

<image002.png>

From: Alan Wang <awang at anonyome.com>
Date: Monday, July 7, 2025 at 11:26 AM
To: Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>, Gail Hodges <gail at oidf.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [Openid-dcp] Results of 6/17 Interop: OpenID4VP v29 + DC API+ DCQL
Hi Gail,

Thank you for the results. Will those new (v29) conformance test suites open to the WG as well? I noticed this page still lists v24.https://openid.net/certification/conformance-testing-for-openid-for-verifiable-presentations/

Alan

From: Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Gail Hodges via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 at 11:31 AM
To: Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>, Gareth Narinesingh <gareth.narinesingh at oidf.org>, Kristina Yasuda <yasudakristina at gmail.com>, torsten_lsfwd <torsten at lodderstedt.net>, Joseph Heenan <joseph.heenan at oidf.org>
Cc: Gail Hodges <gail at oidf.org>
Subject: [EXT] [Openid-dcp] Results of 6/17 Interop: OpenID4VP v29 + DC API+ DCQL
Hello DCP WG

We have had a successful interop on OpenID4VP v29 + DC API + HAIP and DCQL queries #1, #1, and #16.

Participation in the 6/17 interop event included 5 Wallets and 8 Verifiers. On the wallet side this included Bunderstruckerei, Android Credman Wallet, Open Wallet Foundation, Panasonic Connect, and on the verifier side this included Mattr, Bunderstruckerei, CISCO, Digital Credentials Verifier, Open Wallet Foundation, Panasonic Connect, and OpenID Foundation test suite. For noting, one additional Wallet and one additional Verifier did not confirm the ability to use their entity name prior to the issuance of this report, so they are not named.

We had 93 pairs of tests performed between the wallets and verifiers, across all three DCQL queries. Some implementers only enabled mdoc and some SD-JWT, so 33 pairs for DCQL query #1 (mdoc, given name and familyname), 29 pairs for DCQL #2 (SD-JWT, family name, given name), and 31 pairs for #16 (mdoc, family name, given name, DOB, issue date, expirty date, issuing country, issuing authority, document number, portrait, resident address, resident city, resident state, resident postal code). For noting DCQL #16 is the query scoped by NIST NCCoE for the “open a bank account” use case with an mdoc/mDL.

Of the 93 pairs in total, we observed:

  *   84 passed (90%)
  *   7 not pass due to known issue (8%)
  *   2 not pass due to unknown issue (2%)

These results were achieved during a 90min webinar on 6/17, and a remediation period of 1 week post event for asynchronous triage and testing. These results are in line with the May 5th Interop on OpenID4VP v24, and it is encouraging to see similar success with the interoperability on v29.

No material concerns with the specifications or tests were identified through the interop process. The absence of material interoperability issues indicates that OpenID for Verifiable Presentation v29 is on a positive trajectory as it moves to final.

Big thanks to the teams who participated in the interop event on 6/17! Another great milestone for the DCP WG, and encouraging results as the underlying specs move to final!

Gail



<image001.png>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250708/362f70f3/attachment-0001.htm>