[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP
Bjorn Hjelm
bjorn.hjelm at yubico.com
Thu Apr 24 16:14:11 UTC 2025
I support moving this draft forward to public review.
Kind Regards,
Bjorn
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:53 PM Joseph Heenan via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> Dear DCP Working Group Members,
>
>
> As discussed on today’s (yesterday now for some of you!) working group
> call (and as per my email) we would like to start a get WG consensus that
> the current OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification
> approval process.
>
> Please respond to this email within the next 2 days, by end of Thursday
> 22nd April, whether you believe the current draft should proceed to the
> public review or not.
>
> The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here:
> https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html
>
> There is one normative PRs that we agreed during the working group meeting
> to work on during working group last call (just waiting for final reviews
> please!):
>
> Rename authorization_encrypted_response_enc parameter
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls
>
> The above should resolve the point Mike Jones raised during WGLC.
>
> There’s an ongoing attempt to understand Tom Jones’s issue raised during
> WGLC.
>
> There’s also a few non-breaking improvements in PRs that may be merged
> before public review.
>
> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled
> before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with
> details.
>
> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that
> comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group
> chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
>
> The details of the specification approval process can be found here:
> https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
>
> This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working
> group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft
> specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
> The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed
> by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end
> of the Foundation-wide review ends).
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Editors & Chairs
>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/dc972ce9/attachment.htm>
More information about the Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
mailing list