[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP

[Tobias Looker]

I support draft 27 moving to public review.

Thanks,
[MATTR website]<https://mattr.global/>

Tobias Looker
MATTR
+64 273 780 461
tobias.looker at mattr.global<mailto:first.last at mattr.global>
[MATTR website]<https://mattr.global/>
[MATTR on LinkedIn]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/mattrglobal>
[MATTR on Twitter]<https://twitter.com/mattrglobal>
[MATTR on Github]<https://github.com/mattrglobal>

This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it – please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002.

From: Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of torsten--- via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
Date: Thursday, 24 April 2025 at 6:42 PM
To: Digital Credentials Protocols List <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>
Cc: torsten at lodderstedt.net <torsten at lodderstedt.net>
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP
EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated outside of our organisation. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.

I believe draft 27 should proceed to public review.

best regards,
Torsten.
Am 23. Apr. 2025, 00:53 +0200 schrieb Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>:

Dear DCP Working Group Members,

As discussed on today’s (yesterday now for some of you!) working group call (and as per my email) we would like to start a get WG consensus that the current OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.

Please respond to this email within the next 2 days, by end of Thursday 22nd April, whether you believe the current draft should proceed to the public review or not.

The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html

There is one normative PRs that we agreed during the working group meeting to work on during working group last call (just waiting for final reviews please!):

Rename authorization_encrypted_response_enc parameter https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls

The above should resolve the point Mike Jones raised during WGLC.

There’s an ongoing attempt to understand Tom Jones’s issue raised during WGLC.

There’s also a few non-breaking improvements in PRs that may be merged before public review.

If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.

This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.

The details of the specification approval process can be found here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.

This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).

Kindest Regards,
Editors & Chairs

--
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/8223b543/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 22001 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/8223b543/attachment-0005.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 872 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/8223b543/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 528 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/8223b543/attachment-0007.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image004.png
Type: image/png
Size: 921 bytes
Desc: image004.png
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/8223b543/attachment-0008.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1045 bytes
Desc: image005.png
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/8223b543/attachment-0009.png>