[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] Second WGLC for OID4VP
torsten at lodderstedt.net
torsten at lodderstedt.net
Thu Apr 24 06:41:54 UTC 2025
I believe draft 27 should proceed to public review.
best regards,
Torsten.
Am 23. Apr. 2025, 00:53 +0200 schrieb Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>:
> Dear DCP Working Group Members,
>
> As discussed on today’s (yesterday now for some of you!) working group call (and as per my email) we would like to start a get WG consensus that the current OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.
>
> Please respond to this email within the next 2 days, by end of Thursday 22nd April, whether you believe the current draft should proceed to the public review or not.
>
> The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here: https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-27.html
>
> There is one normative PRs that we agreed during the working group meeting to work on during working group last call (just waiting for final reviews please!):
>
> Rename authorization_encrypted_response_enc parameter https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls
>
> The above should resolve the point Mike Jones raised during WGLC.
>
> There’s an ongoing attempt to understand Tom Jones’s issue raised during WGLC.
>
> There’s also a few non-breaking improvements in PRs that may be merged before public review.
>
> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.
>
> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
>
> The details of the specification approval process can be found here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
>
> This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
> The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Editors & Chairs
>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250424/64742684/attachment.htm>
More information about the Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
mailing list