[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final

[Tom Jones]

i do not believe the spec is ready.
see https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/333

Peace ..tom jones


On Sat, Apr 12, 2025 at 2:12 PM Joseph Heenan via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> Dear DCP Working Group Members,
>
> As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG
> consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final
> specification approval process.
>
> Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th
> April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or
> not.
>
> The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here:
> https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html
>
> There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the
> working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:
>
> 1. revamp vp formats: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500
>
> 2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json:
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538
>
> 3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using
> OID4VP ID2:  https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519
>
> 4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of
> implementation experience with DCQL etc:
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539
>
> We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.
>
> We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr:
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459 (a separate email about this
> will follow shortly.)
>
> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled
> before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with
> details.
>
> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that
> comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group
> chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
>
> The details of the specification approval process can be found here:
> https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
>
> This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working
> group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft
> specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
> The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed
> by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end
> of the Foundation-wide review ends).
>
> Kindest Regards,
> Editors & Chairs
>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250418/e77c920e/attachment.htm>