[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final

[Mirko Mollik]

Happy Easter, also supporting to move to public review!

- 
Mirko Mollik 

Identity Architect (EUDI-Wallet-Projekt) mirko.mollik at eudi.sprind.org

SPRIND GmbH 

BUNDESAGENTUR FÜR SPRUNGINNOVATIONEN   
FEDERAL AGENCY FOR DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION  
Lagerhofstraße 4, 04103 Leipzig   

www.sprind.org    

Geschäftsführung: Berit Dannenberg, Rafael Laguna de la Vera  
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Dr.-Ing. E. h. Peter Leibinger  
Amtsgericht Leipzig – HRB 36977  
USt-ID DE328253854 
Disclaimer

> Am 12.04.2025 um 23:11 schrieb Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>:
> 
> Dear DCP Working Group Members,
> 
> As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.
> 
> Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not. 
>  
> The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here:  https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html
> 
> There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:
> 
> 1. revamp vp formats: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500
> 
> 2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538
> 
> 3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2:  https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519
> 
> 4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539
> 
> We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.
> 
> We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459 (a separate email about this will follow shortly.)
> 
> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.
> 
> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
> 
> The details of the specification approval process can be found here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
> 
> This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
> The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).
> 
> Kindest Regards,
> Editors & Chairs
> 
> -- 
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250418/34d17c12/attachment.htm>