[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final

[torsten@lodderstedt.net]

+1 I support proceeding this draft to public review.
Am 13. Apr. 2025, 12:45 +0200 schrieb Paul Bastian via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>:

> I think draft 26 is ready to proceed to public review.
>
> 12 Apr 2025 23:17:16 Stefan Charsley via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>:
> > I believe draft 26 should proceed with public review.

> > Regards
> > Stefan Charsley
> >

> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, 14:12 Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols, <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Dear DCP Working Group Members,
> > >
> > > As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.
> > >
> > > Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not.
> > >
> > > The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here:  https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html
> > >
> > > There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:
> > >
> > > 1. revamp vp formats: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500
> > >
> > > 2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538
> > >
> > > 3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2:  https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519
> > >
> > > 4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539
> > >
> > > We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.
> > >
> > > We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459 (a separate email about this will follow shortly.)
> > >
> > > If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.
> > >
> > > This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
> > >
> > > The details of the specification approval process can be found here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
> > >
> > > This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
> > > The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).
> > >
> > > Kindest Regards,
> > > Editors & Chairs
> > >
> > > --
> > > Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> > > Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
> > > https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
> > >
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250416/b28fae18/attachment.htm>