[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for OpenID for Verifiable Presentations Final

[Paul Bastian]

I think draft 26 is ready to proceed to public review.

12 Apr 2025 23:17:16 Stefan Charsley via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net>:

> I believe draft 26 should proceed with public review.
> 
> Regards
> Stefan Charsley
> 
> 
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, 14:12 Joseph Heenan via Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols, <openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>> Dear DCP Working Group Members,
>> 
>> As discussed on the Friday working group call we would like to get WG consensus that the OpenID4VP draft is ready to start the final specification approval process.
>> 
>> Please respond to this email within the next 7 days, by end of Sunday 20th April, whether you believe the draft should proceed to the public review or not. 
>>  
>> The OpenID4VP document to be reviewed can be found here:  https://openid.net/specs/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-1_0-26.html
>> 
>> There are a couple of normative changes that we discussed during the working group meeting on Friday to work on during working group last call:
>> 
>> 1. revamp vp formats: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/500
>> 
>> 2. Specifies value matching for mdocs via a reference to cbor-to-json: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/538
>> 
>> 3. Remove references to ISO 18013-7 to avoid confusion due to it using OID4VP ID2:  https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/519
>> 
>> 4. Remove anoncreds for now (hoping to add it back in 1.1) due to lack of implementation experience with DCQL etc: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/539
>> 
>> We’d also expect some editorial/non-normative changes during WGLC.
>> 
>> We also discussed scheduling a meeting to talk about the sd-jwt vcld pr: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459 (a separate email about this will follow shortly.)
>> 
>> If there are other topics working group members think need to be handled before the specification moves to final please reply to this email with details.
>> 
>> This is very much just a step on the journey, and it is likely that comments will arrive during the 60 day review period that the working group chooses to fix before the voting period starts.
>> 
>> The details of the specification approval process can be found here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
>> 
>> This email is about the first bullet point on this list "Obtain working group consensus to propose foundation-wide approval of the draft specification", which is often called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
>> The following steps are to start a 60-day Foundation-wide review, followed by the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of the Foundation-wide review ends).
>> 
>> Kindest Regards,
>> Editors & Chairs
>> 
>> -- 
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250413/7ef97fe7/attachment-0001.htm>