[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] notes Re: [agenda] DCP WG call
Kristina Yasuda
yasudakristina at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 21:15:42 UTC 2025
Hi All,
Sending the notes from today's DCP WG call on behalf of Timo due to
some mailing list issues.
+ Here is a google doc that this WG usually uses to plan IIW sessions that
are relevant to this WG and its members:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yTWnl-vHnKN5Q9rEPpPwFq6Ur-sfJL9qExCH2lhgnxA/edit?tab=t.0
For client identifier scheme, please continue the discussion in the
comments to this PR:
https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/401#issuecomment-2776912290
Participants
- Timo Glastra
- Kristina Yasuda
- Joseph Heenan
- Nat Sakimura
- Aaron Parecki
- Akas Shah
- Bjorn Hjelm
- Brian Campbell
- Gareth Oliver
- Christian Bormann
- David Waite
- David Zeuthen
- George Fletcher
- Jan Vereecken
- Juba Saadi
- Ketan Mehta
- Martijn Haring
- Michael Jones
- Daniel Fett
- Oliver Terbu
- Peter Sorotokin
- Rajvardhan Deshmukh
- Samuel
- Steve Venema
- Torsten
- PR 479 - remove PEX <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/479>
- WG agrees to merge PR, issues opened for remaining gaps related to
AnonCreds and W3C VCs
- Issues
- Issue 24 - privacy considerations
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/24>
- Ready for PR, requirements in comments
- Brian going to take a first shot, Torsten and Nat can help
- PR 466 - rename client id prefixes
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/466>
- A lot of approvals, small breaking change
- Christian had a small remark that naming should be updated in HAIP
and other specs (Christian to pick this up)
- Aaron resolved merge conflicts, so it's mergeable
- Issue 299 - iss value to be used in signed requests is not clear?
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/299>
- Ready for PR
- WG agrees: verifier may include it, wallet must ignore it
- Christian to create PR before next monday
- Issue 289 - DCQL Define details for the purpose property
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/289>
- Some contradicting views on the issue
- Main concern is that there's concerns with allowing verifiers to
render free-form text strings in a trust-elevated part of the Wallet UI.
- See the WG discussion comment from Kristina on the issue for more
details
- No agreement during working, at least one strong objection against
removing the purpose for 1.0
OpenID Connect WG discussion
- PR 468 - slight tweak to default treatment of https URLS
<https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/468>
- Shortly discussed a new proposal from the OpenID Connect WG
discussion
- Proposal from Aaron which multiple people support, but also
objection(s)
On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:15 PM Kristina Yasuda <yasudakristina at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> *Daylight saving time started in Europe, *so please be careful with the
> time of the call. it should be 5pm CET, 8am PST.
>
> First Implementer’s Draft of OpenID4VC High Assurance Interoperability
> Profile was approved.
>
> *Tomorrow, we will finish going through open 1.0 issues
> <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20-label%3Aready-for-PR%20-label%3Ahas-PR> !*
>
> Below is the suggested agenda for the DCP WG call tomorrow:
>
> 1. OIDF Antitrust Policy at www.openid.net/antitrust applies / IPR
> reminder
> 2. Note-taking
> 3. Events/External orgs
> - SD-JWT went to IETF Last Call
> - OAuth WGLC for IETF status list draft on-going
> - Voting for W3C VCDM specifications on-going
> - On May 5th, before EIC, 9am-12pm will be in-person OpenID4VC
> interop testing, *12-4pm will be Hybrid DCP WG, *4-6pm will be
> hybrid OpenID4VP interop event and presentation of the results
> 4. ready-for-PR OpenID4VP issues
> <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20label%3Aready-for-PR>
> 5. *reminder to review PRs*:
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Final+1.0%22
> 1. if you are short on time, please prioritize these two PRs:
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/479 and
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459
>
>
> *about VCI....* Here is the list of issues that would require longer
> discussion in OpenID4VCI. we will get to them in 1-2 weeks once we tackle
> all opendi4vp issues. please start looking at them:
>
> - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/71
> - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/205
> - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/305
> - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/1
> - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/99
>
> *about HAIP... *there are few PRs that need to be reviewed too:
> https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/pulls
>
> Best,
> Kristina
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250403/d5fbb760/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
mailing list