[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] notes Re: [agenda] DCP WG call

Kristina Yasuda yasudakristina at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 21:15:42 UTC 2025


Hi All,

Sending the notes from today's DCP WG call on behalf of Timo due to
some mailing list issues.

+ Here is a google doc that this WG usually uses to plan IIW sessions that
are relevant to this WG and its members:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yTWnl-vHnKN5Q9rEPpPwFq6Ur-sfJL9qExCH2lhgnxA/edit?tab=t.0

For client identifier scheme, please continue the discussion in the
comments to this PR:
https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/401#issuecomment-2776912290

Participants

   - Timo Glastra
   - Kristina Yasuda
   - Joseph Heenan
   - Nat Sakimura
   - Aaron Parecki
   - Akas Shah
   - Bjorn Hjelm
   - Brian Campbell
   - Gareth Oliver
   - Christian Bormann
   - David Waite
   - David Zeuthen
   - George Fletcher
   - Jan Vereecken
   - Juba Saadi
   - Ketan Mehta
   - Martijn Haring
   - Michael Jones
   - Daniel Fett
   - Oliver Terbu
   - Peter Sorotokin
   - Rajvardhan Deshmukh
   - Samuel
   - Steve Venema
   - Torsten


   - PR 479 - remove PEX <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/479>
      - WG agrees to merge PR, issues opened for remaining gaps related to
      AnonCreds and W3C VCs
      - Issues


   - Issue 24 - privacy considerations
   <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/24>
      - Ready for PR, requirements in comments
      - Brian going to take a first shot, Torsten and Nat can help


   - PR 466 - rename client id prefixes
   <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/466>
      - A lot of approvals, small breaking change
      - Christian had a small remark that naming should be updated in HAIP
      and other specs (Christian to pick this up)
      - Aaron resolved merge conflicts, so it's mergeable


   - Issue 299 - iss value to be used in signed requests is not clear?
   <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/299>
      - Ready for PR
      - WG agrees: verifier may include it, wallet must ignore it
      - Christian to create PR before next monday


   - Issue 289 - DCQL Define details for the purpose property
   <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/289>
      - Some contradicting views on the issue
      - Main concern is that there's concerns with allowing verifiers to
      render free-form text strings in a trust-elevated part of the Wallet UI.
      - See the WG discussion comment from Kristina on the issue for more
      details
      - No agreement during working, at least one strong objection against
      removing the purpose for 1.0

OpenID Connect WG discussion

   - PR 468 - slight tweak to default treatment of https URLS
   <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/468>
      - Shortly discussed a new proposal from the OpenID Connect WG
      discussion
      - Proposal from Aaron which multiple people support, but also
      objection(s)


On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 10:15 PM Kristina Yasuda <yasudakristina at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> *Daylight saving time started in Europe, *so please be careful with the
> time of the call. it should be 5pm CET, 8am PST.
>
> First Implementer’s Draft of OpenID4VC High Assurance Interoperability
> Profile was approved.
>
> *Tomorrow, we will finish going through open 1.0 issues
> <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20-label%3Aready-for-PR%20-label%3Ahas-PR> !*
>
> Below is the suggested agenda for the DCP WG call tomorrow:
>
>    1. OIDF Antitrust Policy at www.openid.net/antitrust applies / IPR
>    reminder
>    2. Note-taking
>    3. Events/External orgs
>       - SD-JWT went to IETF Last Call
>       - OAuth WGLC for IETF status list draft on-going
>       - Voting for W3C VCDM specifications on-going
>       - On May 5th, before EIC, 9am-12pm will be in-person OpenID4VC
>       interop testing, *12-4pm will be Hybrid DCP WG, *4-6pm will be
>       hybrid OpenID4VP interop event and presentation of the results
>    4. ready-for-PR OpenID4VP issues
>    <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20label%3Aready-for-PR>
>    5. *reminder to review PRs*:
>    https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Final+1.0%22
>       1. if you are short on time, please prioritize these two PRs:
>       https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/479 and
>       https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/459
>
>
> *about VCI....* Here is the list of issues that would require longer
> discussion in OpenID4VCI. we will get to them in 1-2 weeks once we tackle
> all opendi4vp issues. please start looking at them:
>
>    - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/71
>    - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/205
>    - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/305
>    - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/1
>    - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues/99
>
> *about HAIP... *there are few PRs that need to be reviewed too:
> https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/pulls
>
> Best,
> Kristina
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250403/d5fbb760/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list