[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] [agenda] DCP WG call

[Kristina Yasuda]

Hi all,

Below is the suggested agenda for today's DCP WG call. Next week, OIDF
Liaisons will be preparing a document for ISO meeting in the beginning of
march.

   1. OIDF Antitrust Policy at www.openid.net/antitrust applies / IPR
   reminder
   2. Note-taking
   3. Events/External orgs
   4. Public Review Period for Proposed Implementer’s Draft of OpenID4VC
   High Assurance Interoperability Profile has started:
   https://openid.net/public-review-period-for-proposed-implementers-draft-openid4vc-haip/
   5. Update from ISO SC17 WG4 mtg in Nagasaki last week
   6. PRs that need review, will be merged once 3-4 approvals are in,
   without another WG discussion, unless something unexpected comes up
      - breaking change: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/453
      - noteworthy addition:
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/398
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/393
      - smaller PRs:
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/419
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/452
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/449
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/439
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/pull/441
         - https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/pull/85/
         - https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/380
      7. Please continue the discussion in the comments
      - "Clarify the wallet behavior if the signature can't be verfied"
       https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/395
      <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/395>
      - multi RP request: discuss "If the RP sends a request with multiple
      client identifiers for one or more mdocs, how is it supposed to
figure out
      which client identifier to use for checking the session transcript in the
      respective device response?":
      https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/308
      - *[please vote for the options] *agree on the path forward for "same
      credential fulfilling multiple credential queries":
      https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/397
      - *[labelled ready for PR]*: Define expected response if claims and
      claim_sets is omitted in DCQL:
      https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/304
   8. Continue ISO-related OID4VP / HAIP topics:
      - Support for RP authentication with X.509 certificates that do not
      contain a dns name: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/320
   9. other issues that have been asked to be put on the agenda
      - make consistent the use of prefixes in the client_id scheme
      https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/401

Please review priority PRs for OpenID4VP:
https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Final+1.0%22


   - we should also resume discussion on this PR, since it is an
   EUDIW requirement: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/318

Please review priority issues for OpenID4VP 1.0 that do not have a
resolution yet:
https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20-label%3Ahas-PR%20-label%3Aready-for-PR%20

Please volunteer to do PRs for the *ready-for-PR labelled Issues* in
OpenID4VP / OpenID4VCI / HAIP repos.


Thank you!
Kristina
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250210/c01c62a6/attachment.htm>