[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] WGLC for HAIP First Implementers Draft

[steffen schwalm]

I do not agree as the HAIP does not reflect the Implementing Acts and
standardization in Europe related to eIDAS (Art .5a which includes
W3CVCDM v1.1 and ETSI TS 119 472-1 relevant for trust services under eiDAS).

As HAIP is so only limited useful is shall be updated accordingly

Best
Steffen

On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 10:24 AM Giuseppe De Marco via
Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> I support moving HAIP to Implementer’s Draft
>
> best,
> G
>
> Il giorno mer 5 feb 2025 alle ore 00:08 Joseph Heenan via
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols <
> openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net> ha scritto:
>
>> Dear Working Group,
>>
>>
>> As discussed on the Thursday working group call last week (and also on
>> today’s working group call) we would like to get WG consensus that the
>> current HAIP draft is ready to start the Implementer’s draft approval
>> process.
>> Please respond to this email *within the next 2 days, by Thur Feb 6th
>> end of business hours in PST*, whether you believe the current draft
>> should proceed to the public review or not. (Apologies that we didn’t
>> manage to get this email out after the Thursday call as originally
>> discussed!)
>>
>> The HAIP document to be reviewed can be found here:
>> https://openid.github.io/oid4vc-haip/openid4vc-high-assurance-interoperability-profile-wg-draft.html
>>
>> The primary reason for starting the (somewhat lengthy) implementer’s
>> draft process at this point is that doing so now is the only way to publish
>> an implementer’s draft and still hit the timeline to publish a final
>> version of the spec by the end of June, which we want to do in order to hit
>> the timelines promised to the EU, ISO, etc.
>>
>> We certainly don’t view this spec as final - this is very much just a
>> step on the journey, and there may well be comments that arrive during the
>> 45 day public review period that the working group chooses to fix before
>> the voting period starts. There are also a number of open issues in the
>> GitHub issue tracker that the working group wants to solve before we take
>> HAIP to final (you can see the list currently tagged for 1.0 Final here:
>> https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/milestone/2 - please let the
>> chairs know if you think anything is missing from that list).
>>
>> I feel having the public review period and receiving that feedback from a
>> wider group of people is very important to ensuring the spec is the best it
>> can be by the time it goes to final.
>>
>> The details of the Implementer’s draft approval process can be found
>> here: https://openid.net/wg/resources/approving-specifications/.
>> This email is about the first bullet point on this list, which is
>> sometimes called Working Group Last Call (WGLC).
>> The next steps are to start a 45-day Foundation-wide review, followed by
>> the 7 day voting period (the poll itself will open 7 days before the end of
>> the Foundation-wide review ends). If all goes smoothly the official 7 day
>> voting period will hopefully start on Mon 24th March.
>>
>> Kindest Regards,
>> Editors & Chairs
>>
>> Note that, a 7 days WGLC review period would have meant that a 45 days
>> review would start on 24th of December, which overlaps with the Holidays.
>> Therefore, also taking into account that it has been discussed a number of
>> times and agreed in the WG that the WG would like to start the WGLC of
>> OpenID4VCI once two specific PRs are merged, the DCP WG made a decision on
>> Dec 17th WG call to do WGLC in 2 days
>> --
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
>> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>>
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>>
> --
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols mailing list
> Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols at lists.openid.net
>
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250206/5d5046f5/attachment.htm>