[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] questions to ISO/IEC SC17 WG4 from OIDF DCP WG Re: [agenda] DCP WG call

[Kristina Yasuda]

Hi All,
There is an ISO/IEC SC17 WG4 meeting happening this week and Bjorn is
attending as OIDF liaison to ISO. If you have any questions you would like
to ask ISO/IEC SC17 WG4 (they define 23220-3 and 23220-4 which profile
openid4vci and openid4vp respectively), please respond to this email.
Best,
Kristina


On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:18 PM Kristina Yasuda <yasudakristina at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Below is the suggested agenda for today's DCP WG call.
>
> First, few announcements:
> 1.Vote to Approve Proposed Second Implementer’s Draft of OpenID for
> Verifiable Credential Issuance Specification has started:
> https://openid.net/foundation/members/polls/349
>
> 2. Please review if you agree with OpenID4VCI issues labelled* Final 1.0*
> :
> https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VCI/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22
>
>
> 3. Please volunteer to do PRs for the r*eady-for-PR labelled Issues* in
> OpenID4VP / OpenID4VCI / HAIP repos..
>
>
>    1. OIDF Antitrust Policy at www.openid.net/antitrust applies / IPR
>    reminder
>    2. Note-taking
>    3. Introductions/re-introductions
>    4. Agenda bashing/adoption
>    5. Events/External orgs
>    6. LSP POTENTIAL OpenID4VP testing event update
>       7. Started/starting a WGLC for the First Implementer's Draft for
>    HAIP ending 6th Feb 2025.
>    8. Continue ISO-related OID4VP / HAIP topics:
>       - agree on a path forward for "Clarify the wallet behavior if the
>       signature can't be verfied"
>        https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/395
>       <https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/395>
>       - multi RP request: discuss "If the RP sends a request with
>       multiple client identifiers for one or more mdocs, how is it supposed to
>       figure out which client identifier to use for checking the session
>       transcript in the respective device response?":
>       https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/308
>       - agree on the path forward for "same credential fulfilling
>       multiple credential queries":
>       https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues/397
>    9. please review priority PRs for OpenID4VP:
>    https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+milestone%3A%22Final+1.0%22
>       1. we should also resume discussion on this PR, since it is an
>       EUDIW requirement: https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/318
>    10. please review priority issues for OpenID4VP 1.0 that do not have a
>    resolution yet:
>    https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20milestone%3A%22Final%201.0%22%20-label%3Ahas-PR%20-label%3Aready-for-PR%20
>
> Thank you!
> Kristina
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250205/3da0c638/attachment.htm>