[Openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols] [notes] DCP WG + SIOP call

[torsten at lodderstedt.net]

Hi,

here are the notes of today’s call:

Participants:
Joseph Heenan
Brian Campbell
Christian Bormann
Daniel Fett
Jin Wen
Michael Jones
Oliver Terbu
Paul Bastian
Ryan Galluzzo
Tobias Looker
Lee Campbell
Hicham Lozi
Gail Hodges
Pat Buffolino
David Zeuthen
Andres Olave
Alan Wang

Interop Testing

• There are a couple of test events coming up
• ISO Test Event 28.-1.3
• POTENTIAL interop event on Use Case 4 (mDL) 26th / 27th Feb in the Netherlands (co-located with ISO interop event); F2F meeting, online/proximity
• POTENTIAL interop event on Use Case 4 (mDL) in April; exact date will be announced in January, Online only
• Discussed the idea of having an additional test event around OSW. Sense in the room was to instead focus on the ISO event.

Timelines for OpenID4VP publication

20th December
VCI ID2 public review period began
24th December
VP ID3 published!
2025

14th January
Distribute draft of HAIP including proposed browser profile for mDL to ISO mDL WG
22nd January
If we decide to publish an ID1 of HAIP, think about WGLC (if we go much later than this, ID1 voting will overlap with public review of Final)
27th January
VCI ID2 early voting begins
28th January
3 day virtual ISO mDL WG meeting on browser profile for mDL
10th February
VCI ID2 vote concludes
25th February
Hybrid DCP WG meeting in Iceland prior to OAuth Security Workshop


by late March at latest
Start WGLC for VCP / VP / HAIP 1.0 Final
7th April
Date/venue TBC: Hybrid DCP WG meeting in California around IIW


by end June at latest
Publish VCI, VP & HAIP as 1.0 Final


timeline to be discussed
VCI / VP / HAIP 1.1


Next steps conformance testing:

• get ISO mdoc integrated into the OID4VP RP tests
• lift tests to ID 3 then (DCQL)

Those PRs require reviews:

• https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/pull/146
• https://github.com/openid/OpenID4VP/pull/374

Discussed further issues

• https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/issues/140
    • people in the call were in favor of making DCQL MTI in HAIP (instead of PE)
• https://github.com/openid/oid4vc-haip/issues/142
    • Lee and Daniel argue that DCQL is simple enough to be completely be MTI
    • discussion whether value matching is required or not


best regards,
Torsten.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-digital-credentials-protocols/attachments/20250107/e8719880/attachment-0001.htm>