[Specs-cx] Multi-party contract

[David Garcia]

+1 to the second one. I think it's more powerful on multilateral  
contracts, because it allows to define party to party obligations with  
a fine grain detail.

Best regards

David Garcia

El 07/05/2010, a las 06:36, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> escribió:

> In the current draft, <obiligation> is an child element of <party>.  
> However, when we think about the multi-party scenario,
> unless we specify the target that the party is obliged to, it would  
> have no meaning.
>
> Thus, we would have two ways to implement it.
>
> 1. destination as an attribute.
>
> <obligation to="partyid">
>
> 2. Flatten obligations.
>
> <obligation from="partyaid" to="partybid">
>
> Which do you think is better?
>
> From the point of view of writing an application, the second option  
> may be easier.
>
> -- 
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
> http://twitter.com/_nat_en
> _______________________________________________
> Specs-cx mailing list
> Specs-cx at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-cx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-cx/attachments/20100507/4c50a9ff/attachment.htm>