<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#002060;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Following up on this, I understood Mike’s response to be for himself, not the council. Is this correct? If so, what can I do to help the council make a decision?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">– <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Annabelle Richard Backman<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">AWS Identity<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:black">From: </span></b><span style="color:black">specs-council <openid-specs-council-bounces@lists.openid.net> on behalf of Mike Jones via specs-council <openid-specs-council@lists.openid.net><br>
<b>Reply-To: </b>Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Sunday, November 24, 2019 at 2:09 PM<br>
<b>To: </b>"Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna@amazon.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"marius.scurtescu@coinbase.com" <marius.scurtescu@coinbase.com>, "openid-specs-council@lists.openid.net" <openid-specs-council@lists.openid.net><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [OIDFSC] Request for review of revision of the RISC WG charter<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#002060">Approve of this rechartering.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#002060"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#002060"> -- Mike</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;color:#002060"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> specs-council <openid-specs-council-bounces@lists.openid.net>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Richard Backman, Annabelle via specs-council<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:22 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> openid-specs-council@lists.openid.net<br>
<b>Cc:</b> marius.scurtescu@coinbase.com<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [OIDFSC] Request for review of revision of the RISC WG charter</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Hello OIDF Specifications Council,</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">The chairs of the RISC Working Group (myself and Marius Scurtescu) request that you review and approve our proposed revision of the RISC WG charter, attached to this message in PDF format. The purpose of these
revisions is to expand the scope of the working group to cover a broader set of use cases for sharing signals and events, such as those addressed by the
<a href="https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloud.google.com%2Fblog%2Fproducts%2Fidentity-security%2Fre-thinking-federated-identity-with-the-continuous-access-evaluation-protocol&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7Ca202012348684c26592208d76cc991f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637097485619161179&sdata=pCYvCCJNy0O59tIyg51xtsLMB5ohUq2ZzpMyGQE7Ft8%3D&reserved=0">
Continuous Access Evaluation Protocol (CAEP)</a>. These changes will allow us to bring CAEP development into the working group, and help us develop a common event sharing infrastructure to support RISC, CAEP, and other future use cases.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Note also that this revision renames the working group from “RISC” to “Shared Signals and Events” in order to reflect its broader scope.</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">– <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Annabelle Richard Backman<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Co-chair, RISC Working Group, OpenID Foundation<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>