My understanding is a place to review and vote on finalized working group proposals. I'm not a huge fan since I don't think it should be black and white once we get a proposal. We should be working with the author(s) to get the proposal into the state it needs to be versus just voting against it.<br>
<br>I would thus still prefer to use the <a href="mailto:specs@openid.net">specs@openid.net</a> mailing list and have clear threads for voting by the specs council as needed. Quite honestly, not caring if others "vote" in the thread and then have those votes not be binding.<br>
<br>--David<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Martin Atkins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mart@degeneration.co.uk">mart@degeneration.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
It looks like this mailing list is starting to replace specs@ as the place to discuss working group proposals.<br>
<br>
I'm not sure what the solution is, but having to different mailing lists that are both for discussing working group proposals is not ideal.<br>
<br>
What was the intended purpose of this mailing list?<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>