[OIDFSC] Digital Credentials Protocols WG - Proposed Charter

Thu Jul 6 14:17:02 UTC 2023

I approve as well.

Sorry, I missed the original post.

> On Jul 6, 2023, at 10:10 AM, Michael Jones via specs-council <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> 
> It appears that Kristina didn’t join the list at https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-council before sending the request.  Both my reply and yours are archived, which include the original request, so I think that’s good enough.
>  
> FYI, the 15-day Specs Council review period will complete on Saturday, July 15th.
>  
>                                                        -- Mike
>  
> From: Nat Sakimura <nat at nat.consulting> 
> Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 1:29 AM
> To: Michael Jones <michael_b_jones at hotmail.com>
> Cc: Kristina Yasuda <Kristina.Yasuda at microsoft.com>; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net; jacob.ideskog at curity.io; David Luna <david.luna at forgerock.com>; Brian Campbell <bcampbell at pingidentity.com>; Giuseppe De Marco <giuseppe.demarco at teamdigitale.governo.it>; Oliver.terbu <Oliver.terbu at spruceid.com>; Mark Haine <mark at considrd.consulting>; Takahiko Kawasaki <taka at authlete.com>; Morteza Ansari <morteza at sharppics.com>; Joseph Heenan <joseph at authlete.com>; Vittorio Bertocci <vittorio.bertocci at okta.com>; Judith Kahrer <judith.kahrer at curity.io>; Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten at lodderstedt.net>; timo at animo.id
> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Digital Credentials Protocols WG - Proposed Charter
>  
> LGTM. 
>  
> One peculiarity - the original email has not been recorded in the list archive, nor have I received it. 
> See https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/. 
> Kristina, did you get any error responses? For the recording purposes, it would be good to have it recorded. 
> If it is the list issue, we need to fix it. 
>  
> Best wishes, 
>  
> Nat 
>  
> 2023年7月1日(土) 13:12 Michael Jones via specs-council <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net <mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>>:
> I approve of the formation of this working group as a specifications council member.
>  
>                                                        -- Mike
>  
> From: Kristina Yasuda <Kristina.Yasuda at microsoft.com <mailto:Kristina.Yasuda at microsoft.com>> 
> Sent: Friday, June 30, 2023 11:08 AM
> To: openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net <mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>
> Cc: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten at lodderstedt.net <mailto:torsten at lodderstedt.net>>; Joseph Heenan <joseph at authlete.com <mailto:joseph at authlete.com>>; Mark Haine <mark at considrd.consulting <mailto:mark at considrd.consulting>>; Oliver.terbu <Oliver.terbu at spruceid.com <mailto:Oliver.terbu at spruceid.com>>; Takahiko Kawasaki <taka at authlete.com <mailto:taka at authlete.com>>; Vittorio Bertocci <vittorio.bertocci at okta.com <mailto:vittorio.bertocci at okta.com>>; Giuseppe De Marco <giuseppe.demarco at teamdigitale.governo.it <mailto:giuseppe.demarco at teamdigitale.governo.it>>; Brian Campbell <bcampbell at pingidentity.com <mailto:bcampbell at pingidentity.com>>; michael_b_jones at hotmail.com <mailto:michael_b_jones at hotmail.com>;jacob.ideskog at curity.io <mailto:jacob.ideskog at curity.io>; Morteza Ansari <morteza at sharppics.com <mailto:morteza at sharppics.com>>; David Luna <david.luna at forgerock.com <mailto:david.luna at forgerock.com>>; timo at animo.id <mailto:timo at animo.id>; Judith Kahrer <judith.kahrer at curity.io <mailto:judith.kahrer at curity.io>>
> Subject: Digital Credentials Protocols WG - Proposed Charter 
>  
> Dear Specs Council,
> (cc: all proposers)
>  
> Please find below text for the charter of a proposed Digital Credentials Protocols Working Group.
>  
> Thank you,
> Kristina
>  
> Digital Credentials Protocols WG - Charter 
>  
> 1) Working Group name:
> Digital Credentials Protocols Working Group
>  
> 2) Purpose:
> In the Issuer-Holder-Verifier Model, Issuers issue Digital Credentials to the Holder’s Wallet, which the End-User can then use to present the Digital Credentials to the Verifiers. Digital Credentials are cryptographically signed statements about a Subject, typically the Wallet Holder. Verifiers can check the authenticity of the data in the Digital Credentials and optionally enforce Key Binding, Biometrics Binding and/or Claim-based Binding i.e., ask the Wallet to prove that it is the intended Holder of the Digital Credential.
>  
> The goal of this WG is to develop OpenID specifications for the Issuer-Holder-Verifier-Model use-cases to enable issuance and presentations of the Digital Credentials of any format (IETF SD-JWTl, ISO/IEC 18013-5, etc.) and pseudonymous authentication from the End-User to the Verifier.
> These specifications are aimed at enabling End-Users to gain more control, privacy, and portability over their identity information; cheaper, faster, and more secure identity verification, when transforming physical credentials into digital ones using digital credentials; and a universal approach to handle identification, authentication, and authorization in digital and physical space.
>  
> The work is planned to be done in liaison with the European Commission, Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF), the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI), and ISO/IEC SC17 WG4 and WG10, which have expressed interest in profiling specifications proposed to be worked on in this WG. There is also a liaison with the OpenWallet Foundation (OWF), to foster implementation of the standards developed by this WG. 
>  
> 3) Scope:
> Creation of specifications describing:
> 
> ·        Issuance of Digital Credentials from the Issuer to the Wallet (acting as RP). This includes the mechanisms to specify which Digital Credentials the Issuer is capable of issuing. 
> ·        Presentation of Digital Credentials between the Wallet (acting as IdP) and the Verifier via online (over the Internet) and proximity (near field communication) communication channels. This includes the mechanisms to specify which Digital Credentials are being requested.
> ·        Pseudonymous authentication from the End-User to the Verifier.
> ·        Interoperability profiles of the above specifications
> 
> Out of Scope:
> Legal or regulatory advice, Identity Proofing, Identity information verification, new Credential formats
>  
> 4) Proposed specifications:
> OpenID for Verifiable Presentations
> OpenID for Verifiable Credential Issuance
> Self-Issued OpenID Provider v2.0
> OpenID for Verifiable Presentations over BLE
> OpenID Connect UserInfo Verifiable Credentials
> Security and Trust in OpenID for Verifiable Credentials
> OpenID4VC High Assurance Interoperability Profile with SD-JWT VC
>  
> 5) Anticipated audience or users
> ·        Issuers of Digital Credentials
> ·        Verifiers Digital Credentials
> ·        Wallet Providers
> ·        Trust Framework operators
> ·        Regulators
> ·        Security Researchers
> ·        Developer tools & infrastructure/service provider
> 
> 6) Language:
> English
>  
> 7) Method of work
> Mailing list and telephone/internet conference calls combined with face-to-face (where needed) and
> information sharing/collaborative working via online tools.
>  
> 8) The basis for determining when the work is completed:
> Approved “final” specifications consistent with the purpose and scope that have been through the OpenID Foundation process including vote by the membership and running code in one or more proof-of-concept, interoperability event or commercial project.
>  
> Background info:
> Related Work
> The work is planned to be done in liaison with the European Commission, Decentralized Identity Foundation (DIF), ETSI, and ISO/IEC SC17 WG4 and WG10, which have expressed interest in profiling specifications proposed to be worked on in this WG.
> https://openid.net/sg/openid4vc/specifications/
>  
> Proposers:
> Kristina Yasuda, Microsoft
> Torsten Lodderstedt, yes.com <http://yes.com/> AG
> Joseph Heenan, Authlete
> Mark Haine, Considrd.Consulting Limited
> Oliver Terbu, Spruce Systems Inc.
> Takahiko Kawasaki, Authlete
> Vittorio Bertocci, Okta
> Giuseppe De Marco, Dipartimento per la trasformazione digitale
> Brian Campbell, Ping Identity
> Michael B. Jones, independent
> Jacob Ideskog, Curity AB
> Morteza Ansari, independent
> David Luna, ForgeRock
> Timo Glastra, Animo Solutions
> Judith Kahrer, Curity AB
> 
> Anticipated contributions:
> https://openid.net/sg/openid4vc/specifications/
> https://github.com/vcstuff/oid4vc-haip-sd-jwt-vc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20230706/4643abe1/attachment-0001.html>