[OIDFSC] Request for review of revision of the RISC WG charter

Wed Jan 8 21:46:13 UTC 2020

Great, thank you for the confirmation.

–
Annabelle Richard Backman
AWS Identity

From: specs-council <openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Nat Sakimura via specs-council <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>
Reply-To: Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 at 5:48 AM
To: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna at amazon.com>
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>, "openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net" <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>, "marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com" <marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com>
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Request for review of revision of the RISC WG charter

I understood that he voted +1.
We only count -1 in the charter process and since there was no opposition, it was approved on Dec. 3 as the default action.

On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 6:47 AM Richard Backman, Annabelle via specs-council <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>> wrote:
Following up on this, I understood Mike’s response to be for himself, not the council. Is this correct? If so, what can I do to help the council make a decision?

–
Annabelle Richard Backman
AWS Identity

From: specs-council <openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net>> on behalf of Mike Jones via specs-council <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>>
Reply-To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>>
Date: Sunday, November 24, 2019 at 2:09 PM
To: "Richard Backman, Annabelle" <richanna at amazon.com<mailto:richanna at amazon.com>>
Cc: "marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com<mailto:marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com>" <marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com<mailto:marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com>>, "openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>" <openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>>
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Request for review of revision of the RISC WG charter

Approve of this rechartering.

                                                       -- Mike

From: specs-council <openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council-bounces at lists.openid.net>> On Behalf Of Richard Backman, Annabelle via specs-council
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 12:22 AM
To: openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net>
Cc: marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com<mailto:marius.scurtescu at coinbase.com>
Subject: [OIDFSC] Request for review of revision of the RISC WG charter

Hello OIDF Specifications Council,

The chairs of the RISC Working Group (myself and Marius Scurtescu) request that you review and approve our proposed revision of the RISC WG charter, attached to this message in PDF format. The purpose of these revisions is to expand the scope of the working group to cover a broader set of use cases for sharing signals and events, such as those addressed by the Continuous Access Evaluation Protocol (CAEP)<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloud.google.com%2Fblog%2Fproducts%2Fidentity-security%2Fre-thinking-federated-identity-with-the-continuous-access-evaluation-protocol&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7Ca202012348684c26592208d76cc991f8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637097485619161179&sdata=pCYvCCJNy0O59tIyg51xtsLMB5ohUq2ZzpMyGQE7Ft8%3D&reserved=0>. These changes will allow us to bring CAEP development into the working group, and help us develop a common event sharing infrastructure to support RISC, CAEP, and other future use cases.

Note also that this revision renames the working group from “RISC” to “Shared Signals and Events” in order to reflect its broader scope.

–
Annabelle Richard Backman
Co-chair, RISC Working Group, OpenID Foundation

--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20200108/378f3a11/attachment-0001.html>