[OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL TODAY

[Dick Hardt]

I would have gotten on the call if I had known it was going to happen. It was proposed, but not confirmed as it did not seem that anyone was responding with a yes.

I don't agree that the Connect proposal is ready to be approved. I have been compiling my reasons and will send out shortly.

On 2010-06-04, at 5:33 PM, Mike Jones wrote:

> David Recordon, Allen Tom, and I just got off the specs council call that we had.  While our call didn't represent a quorum of the specs council, we agreed upon these points:
> All the proposed working groups should proceed to be formed.
> We encourage all the working groups to work together towards as a seamless a whole as possible.
> There's a growing recognition that there’s substantial commonality in the mechanisms behind the artifact binding, the connect proposal, and the possible evolution of the hybrid specification.
> We encourage people to join the working groups and do the actual work, including implementations.
>                 -- Mike
>  
> From: Chris Messina [chris.messina at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:11 PM
> To: David Recordon
> Cc: Allen Tom; Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net; Dick Hardt
> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL TODAY
> 
> FWIW, +1.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed with Allen.
> 
> --David
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Allen Tom <atom at yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> I think we’ve had enough time to consider the new proposals, and that all the proposed WGs should be formed.
> 
> Allen
> 
> 
> On 6/4/10 11:52 AM, "Dick Hardt" <dick.hardt at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2010-06-04, at 10:01 AM, Mike Jones wrote:
> 
> First, unless anyone voices an objection to Breno filling the remaining slot, the specs council now consists of:
>                 Johnny Bufu
>                 Dick Hardt
>                 Mike Jones
>                 Breno de Medeiros
>                 David Recordon
>                 Nat Sakimura
>                 Allen Tom
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> Second, I believe that this is the status of existing specification proposals:
>                 Connect:  Proposed Fri, May 21.  Will be automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
> 
> I asked a number of questions about Connect that I have not yet seen responses to. I think the issues need to be addressed or the proposal withdrawn.
> 
>                Discovery:  Proposed Fri, May 21.  Will be automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
>                 Core:  Proposed Mon, May 24.  Will be automatically approved on Tue, Jun 8.
>                 Attributes:  Proposed Tue, May 25.  Will be automatically approved on Wed, Jun 9.
>  
> Therefore, if we’re going to provide any input to the Connect and Discovery working groups before they’re automatically approved after 15 days of inaction on our part, we need to do it today.
> 
> We can also do it over email!
> 
> Does anyone have concerns with Discovery, Core and Attributes? David had mentioned that some used the OpenID term and some did not have enough proposers. I think all those issues have now been addressed. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Chris Messina
> Open Web Advocate, Google
> 
> Personal: http://factoryjoe.com
> Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina 
> ...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina 
> 
> This email is:   [ ] shareable    [X] ask first   [ ] private

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20100604/50c8102f/attachment.html>