[OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL TODAY

[Mike Jones]

David Recordon, Allen Tom, and I just got off the specs council call that we had.  While our call didn't represent a quorum of the specs council, we agreed upon these points:

  *   All the proposed working groups should proceed to be formed.
  *   We encourage all the working groups to work together towards as a seamless a whole as possible.
  *   There's a growing recognition that there’s substantial commonality in the mechanisms behind the artifact binding, the connect proposal, and the possible evolution of the hybrid specification.
  *   We encourage people to join the working groups and do the actual work, including implementations.

                -- Mike



________________________________
From: Chris Messina [chris.messina at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 4:11 PM
To: David Recordon
Cc: Allen Tom; Anthony Nadalin; Mike Jones; openid-specs-council at lists.openid.net; Dick Hardt
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Specs council status and work - POSSIBLE CALL TODAY

FWIW, +1.

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 4:08 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com<mailto:recordond at gmail.com>> wrote:
Agreed with Allen.

--David


On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Allen Tom <atom at yahoo-inc.com<mailto:atom at yahoo-inc.com>> wrote:
I think we’ve had enough time to consider the new proposals, and that all the proposed WGs should be formed.

Allen


On 6/4/10 11:52 AM, "Dick Hardt" <dick.hardt at gmail.com<http://dick.hardt@gmail.com>> wrote:


On 2010-06-04, at 10:01 AM, Mike Jones wrote:

First, unless anyone voices an objection to Breno filling the remaining slot, the specs council now consists of:
                Johnny Bufu
                Dick Hardt
                Mike Jones
                Breno de Medeiros
                David Recordon
                Nat Sakimura
                Allen Tom

+1


Second, I believe that this is the status of existing specification proposals:
                Connect:  Proposed Fri, May 21.  Will be automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.

I asked a number of questions about Connect that I have not yet seen responses to. I think the issues need to be addressed or the proposal withdrawn.

               Discovery:  Proposed Fri, May 21.  Will be automatically approved on Sat, Jun 5.
                Core:  Proposed Mon, May 24.  Will be automatically approved on Tue, Jun 8.
                Attributes:  Proposed Tue, May 25.  Will be automatically approved on Wed, Jun 9.

Therefore, if we’re going to provide any input to the Connect and Discovery working groups before they’re automatically approved after 15 days of inaction on our part, we need to do it today.

We can also do it over email!

Does anyone have concerns with Discovery, Core and Attributes? David had mentioned that some used the OpenID term and some did not have enough proposers. I think all those issues have now been addressed.






--
Chris Messina
Open Web Advocate, Google

Personal: http://factoryjoe.com
Follow me on Buzz: http://buzz.google.com/chrismessina
...or Twitter: http://twitter.com/chrismessina

This email is:   [ ] shareable    [X] ask first   [ ] private
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20100605/709aaef1/attachment-0001.html>