[OIDFSC] [VOTE] Contract Exchange Working Group Proposal

[Allen Tom]

+1

Definitely would like to be supportive of all the very advanced use 
cases for OpenID in Japan. Hopefully CX wan be used as a reference for 
the rest of the world when we catch up.

Allen

Mike Jones wrote:
> With these changes, +1.
>
> 				-- Mike
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Recordon [mailto:recordond at gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:12 AM
> To: Brad Fitzpatrick; Dick Hardt; Mike Jones; Johnny Bufu; Josh Hoyt; Allen Tom
> Cc: specs-council at openid.net
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Contract Exchange Working Group Proposal
>
> +1 to recommending this working group proposal.
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:09 AM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Since we've had so many different threads on this proposal, I'd like
>> to have one final thread where there is a clear vote held on the
>> latest revision of the proposal.  The proposal can be found at
>> http://wiki.openid.net/Working_Groups%3AContract_Exchange_1 and in the
>> email below.  If you're a member of the Specs Council, please respond
>> ASAP.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --David
>>
>> (i) WG name
>> Contract Exchange Extension Working Group
>>
>> (ii) Purpose
>> The purpose of this WG is to produce a standard OpenID extension to
>> the OpenID Authentication protocol that enables arbitrary parties to
>> create and exchange a mutually-digitally-signed "contract". This
>> contract can be both broadband and mobile friendly through appropriate
>> bindings that will be defined for each use case.
>>
>> (iii) Scope
>> Development of a specification that allows parties to exchange a
>> mutually-digitally-signed contract leveraging on OpenID Authentication
>> 2.0 and OpenID Attribute Exchange 2.0 via the appropriate bindings
>> defined in the specification.
>>
>> Out of scope
>>
>>    * UI and user experience: The Working Group will develop the wire
>> protocol and and any related processing mechanisms required to support
>> it but user interface and experience is out of scope.
>>    * Public Key Discovery method: This functionality will be either
>> defined in the XRD 1.0 specification currently in progress at the
>> OASIS XRI TC or a mechanism that works with OpenID Authentication
>> 2.0/2.1 discovery will be defined independently.
>>    * Terms negotiation: Actual negotiation of the terms of a contract
>> should be dealt with out-of-band or by other specifications.
>>    * Assurance: These will be handled by third-party assurance
>> programs or other identity governance frameworks.
>>    * Trust hierarchies. It is the intent that this specification be
>> usable by any trust community, whether it uses conventional PKI
>> hierarchies, peer-to-peer trust mechanisms, reputation systems, or
>> other forms of trust assurance. The specification of any particular
>> trust root, trust hierarchy, or trust policy is explicitly out of
>> scope.
>>
>> (iv) Proposed List of Specifications
>>    * Contract Exchange 1.0 - Expected completion of the first
>> iteration is in Q1 2009.
>>
>> (v) Anticipated audience or users of the work
>> Implementers of OpenID Providers and Relying Parties, especially those
>> who require security and accountability features to exchange sensitive
>> customer information (e.g. personally identifiable information and
>> credit card numbers) responsibly among trusted parties.
>>
>> (vi) Language in which the WG will conduct business
>> English.
>>
>> (vii) Method of work
>> E-mail discussions on the working group mailing list, working group
>> conference calls, and possibly face-to-face meetings at conferences.
>>
>> (viii) Basis for determining when the work of the WG is completed
>> Drafts will be evaluated on the basis of whether they increase or
>> decrease consensus within the working group. The work will be
>> completed once it is apparent that maximal consensus on the drafts has
>> been achieved, consistent with the purpose and scope.
>>
>> (b) Background Information.
>> (i) Related work being done by other WGs or organizations
>>    * OpenID Authentication 2.1 [AN]
>>    * OpenID Attribute Exchange Extension 2.0 [AX]
>>    * LIberty Alliance Identity Governance Framework [IGF] 1.0 Draft
>>    * XML Advanced Electronic Signatures [XAdES]
>>    * WS-Trust 1.3 [WS-trust]
>>    * XRI 2.0 and XRI 3.0 [XRI]
>>    * XRD 1.0 [XRI]
>>    * XDI 1.0 [XDI]
>>    * Vendor Relationship Management [VRM]
>>
>> (ii) Proposers
>>    * Drummond Reed, =drummond, drummond.reed at parity.com,
>> Cordance/Parity/OASIS (U.S.A)
>>    * Henrik Biering, hb at netamia.com, Netamia (Denmark)
>>    * Hideki Nara, hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp, Tact Communications (Japan)
>>    * John Bradeley, jbradley at mac.com, OASIS IDTrust Member Section (Canada)
>>    * Mike Graves, mgraves at janrain.com, JanRain, Inc. (U.S.A.)
>>    * Nat Sakimura, n-sakimura at nri.co.jp, Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.(Japan)
>>    * Robert Ott, robert.ott at clavid.com, Clavid (Switzerland)
>>    * Tatsuki Sakushima, tatsuki at nri.com, NRI America, Inc. (U.S.A.)
>>    * Toru Yamaguchi, trymch at gmail.com, DeNA Co. Ltd.  (Japan)
>>
>> Editors:
>> Nat Sakimura, n-sakimura at nri.co.jp, Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>>
>> (iii) Anticipated Contributions
>>    * Sakimura, N., et. al "OpenID Trusted data eXchange Extention
>> Specification (draft)", Oct. 2008. [TX2008].
>>
>>     
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20090129/7922f9b8/attachment-0002.htm>