[OIDFSC] Fwd: Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid Working Group

[Nat Sakimura]

Looks like specs-council list does not accept mails with more than couple of
CCs.

I am forwarding it to the list without CCs.

=nat

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid
Working Group
To: David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>, Josh Hoyt <josh at janrain.com>,
"specs-council at openid.net" <specs-council at openid.net>


Right. As I have pointed out, it is just the formatting thing.

For the purpose of the ease of parsing out those document by a future
reader, I think it is a good practice to adopt the same format.

I can just go ahead and reorder them and number them, but I think it is
better for the proposer to do it.

=nat


On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 5:47 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nat,
> The wiki just creates the numbered "table of contents" based off of the
> order of the headings on the page.  4.1 doesn't actually prescribe an order
> of the information, just that all of the information listed in A and B are
> there.  As far as I can tell, all of that information is in the proposal.
> So yes, having a similar structure is a good thing though I'm able to easily
> read and understand this proposal.
>
> --David
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe I am a formalist, but I think it is better for the WG proposal to
>> follow exactly the structure and the numbering scheme layed out in the
>> OpenID Process document Article 4.1 so that we will get a consitent format
>> for every WGs.
>>
>> One of the failing reason for the spec concil not issuing recommendation
>> is exactly this. (Article 4.2 (a)).
>> SInce it is just a formatting issue, it is better to do it.
>>
>> =nat
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1 from me as well.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: specs-council-bounces at openid.net [mailto:
>>> specs-council-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of Josh Hoyt
>>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:54 PM
>>> To: specs-council at openid.net
>>> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid
>>> Working Group
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I am +1 for approving this proposal.
>>>
>>> Also +1 from me.
>>>
>>> j3h
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>>
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20090114/40759d9f/attachment-0002.htm>